The Supreme Court's potentially explosive voting rights case
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
With the current Supreme Court term nearly at an end, just one potentially blockbuster decision remains, and it could be a doozy. That's because the case deals with voting rights, and voting rights may be the most incendiary issue confronting the country right now.
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee deals with two issues: First, does Arizona's out-of precinct policy, which discards ballots cast outside of the voter's designated precinct, violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA); second, does Arizona's ballot-collection law, which forbids anyone other than the voter him- or herself from handling a completed early ballot, violate the same section of the VRA or the 15th Amendment.
According to SCOTUSblog, during oral arguments in March it seemed like a majority of the justices were ready to uphold both provisions, which Democrats describe as forms of vote suppression. That would be controversial enough to inspire considerable outrage among liberals and progressives. But the severity of the outrage will also be determined by how narrow or broad the ruling turns out to be.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On that question, Sean Trende of RealClearPolitics weighed in on Monday with some informed speculation that the most likely author of a majority opinion in the case is conservative Samuel Alito. An Alito-authored opinion wouldn't guarantee a sweeping decision that established leeway under the VRA for states to disqualify voters and ballots for a broader range of reasons. But it would certainly be compatible with such a result.
Just what America needs less than six months after the Jan. 6 insurrection and attempted reversal of the 2020 presidential election: A landmark Supreme Court decision strengthening the hand of Republican-controlled states in their efforts to increase restrictions on voting.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Damon Linker is a senior correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also a former contributing editor at The New Republic and the author of The Theocons and The Religious Test.
-
Local elections 2026: where are they and who is expected to win?The Explainer Labour is braced for heavy losses and U-turn on postponing some council elections hasn’t helped the party’s prospects
-
6 of the world’s most accessible destinationsThe Week Recommends Experience all of Berlin, Singapore and Sydney
-
How the FCC’s ‘equal time’ rule worksIn the Spotlight The law is at the heart of the Colbert-CBS conflict
-
Big-time money squabbles: the conflict over California’s proposed billionaire taxTalking Points Californians worth more than $1.1 billion would pay a one-time 5% tax
-
Supreme Court upholds California gerrymanderSpeed Read The emergency docket order had no dissents from the court
-
Did Alex Pretti’s killing open a GOP rift on guns?Talking Points Second Amendment groups push back on the White House narrative
-
Washington grapples with ICE’s growing footprint — and futureTALKING POINTS The deadly provocations of federal officers in Minnesota have put ICE back in the national spotlight
-
Trump’s Greenland ambitions push NATO to the edgeTalking Points The military alliance is facing its worst-ever crisis
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
How robust is the rule of law in the US?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION John Roberts says the Constitution is ‘unshaken,’ but tensions loom at the Supreme Court
