Is wokeness self-defeating?
Over 100 House Republicans voted against removing Confederate statues from the Capitol, a majority of the caucus. A GOP congressman was linked to a fundraiser with a notorious white nationalist. Both stories appear to confirm liberal commentator Matthew Yglesias' argument that conservatives are steamed about critical race theory because they're the villains on race and American history.
Or do they? Critical race theorists are correct to note that racism has been a tragic and malevolent part of our country's history, with consequences we continue to live with today. But treating patriotism and any serious reckoning with this experience as if they are in tension with each other — as the "provocative" 1619 Project and various national anthem protests to some extent do — is something we will regret.
It does not leave us with a shared country or contribute to social peace among diverse groups. Anti-patriotic wokeness is also self-defeating on its own terms: In a polarized political climate, it is actually deepening insensitivities among people who feel forced to choose between love of country and racial justice.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Not everyone will choose greater sensitivity, as the woke hope. Instead some now see any change to issues concerning race as a surrender to those who see the entire American project as irredeemably connected to white supremacy. One Republican congressman cited critical race theory as a reason for voting against the Confederate statue removal. Others did so in justifying their opposition to Juneteenth. It's morally defensible to separate an admiration for the Founding Fathers from the Confederacy, despite fears of a slippery slope. But that separation is under assault and not well supported by the view that the arrival of slavery represents our true founding. Many opponents of removing Confederate monuments have long argued that those coming for Jefferson Davis would not stop there but move on to Thomas Jefferson. And while those who go from there to Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant remain a radical minority, Yglesias' own career trajectory demonstrates how hard it is for liberals to defend ground from those to their left.
Radicalism breeds reaction. It is all unnecessary. As Yglesias himself concedes, some of the premises of the 1619 Project are historically wrong and the old American consensus that progress toward racial equality represents the true fulfilment of our 1776 founding principles is the better path, even as many conservatives — myself included — argue that ideas by themselves aren't a sufficient basis for a nation-state.
The alternative will close the minds of many decent people with normal patriotic instincts to the appeals for racial justice their fellow countrymen are making.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Chicken with Steph's spice
The Week Recommends This Caribbean-inspired recipe is mouthwateringly delicious
By The Week UK Published
-
A peaceful seaside village in Turkey
The Week Recommends Çıralı has been spared the 'scourge' of all-inclusive resort development
By The Week UK Published
-
Tax plans spell trouble in the North Sea
Talking Point Labour’s tax plans are whipping up a storm. Are the worries of opponents justified?
By The Week UK Published
-
What are the lessons from Ukraine's Russia incursion?
Talking Points And what do they mean for Putin's red lines?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
RFK Jr.'s Trump endorsement: GOP windfall or minor jolt?
Talking Points Some believe RFK Jr. abandoning his presidential bid could be game-changing — others aren't so sure
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
A brief history of third parties in the US
In Depth Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How will Kamala Harris' ban on grocery price gouging work?
Talking Points And can it bring down prices?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Thailand: heading for a 'political inferno'?
Talking Points Hopes of change fading as establishment moves to dismantle reformist Move Forward party
By The Week UK Published
-
Slash taxes on tips? Harris and Trump agree.
Talking Points Vegas workers might benefit. Will anybody else?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Kamala Harris' foreign policy a 'mix of might and right'
Talking Points How she would approach America's relationships in the world
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Venezuela votes: 'the mother of all stolen elections'
Talking Points Nicolás Maduro has pulled off a breath-taking steal at the ballot box, but his power increasingly relies on foreign allies
By The Week UK Published