The Jan. 6 committee won't find a smoking gun


Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Capitol insurrection, and the Jan. 6 committee is still plugging away. Just this week, the panel announced that it wants to interview Sean Hannity, whose stressed-out behind-the-scenes texts about then-President Trump told a very different story from his pronouncements on Fox News. The committee is tangling with Bernard Kerik, the Trump ally who was once the New York City police commissioner, about documents that may shed light on efforts to overturn Joe Biden's election. There's even talk of holding televised hearings in prime time so that the public can see testimony and evidence for themselves.
"The public needs to know, needs to hear from people under oath about what led up to Jan. 6, and to some degree, what has continued after Jan. 6," said the committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).
This is all very important work, of course. But if the goal is to bring about a reckoning about Jan. 6, it's probably not going to work.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Americans already know — if they want to — what happened both on the day of the insurrection and in the preceding months. Joe Biden won the election. Donald Trump lied and said the election was stolen. He tried to get state-level officials to overturn votes. He brought a lot of lawsuits challenging results. He pressured Mike Pence to reject electoral votes. And when all that didn't work, he riled up a crowd of supporters and sent them to the Capitol, then sat silently in the White House while they rampaged.
Nothing about that story has changed in the last year. For the most part, it all happened out in the open. The committee's job is merely to fill in the details. Maybe there will be some high-level criminal prosecutions as a result. Maybe not.
One gets the sense that Trump's detractors still hope there will be a sudden lightbulb moment — when some damning testimony or piece of evidence causes the scales to fall from America's eyes, and the former president's power over his supporters (or the GOP, at least) is finally broken. But that didn't happen after the Access Hollywood tape, nor after Charlottesville, nor after the Mueller Investigation, nor after two impeachments. Indeed, our divisions have only become more intractable over the last year.
There will be no "aha!" moment. There is no smoking gun. There is only us, the American people, and what we choose to do about what we already know.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
England’s ‘dysfunctional’ children’s care system
In the Spotlight A new report reveals that protection of youngsters in care in England is failing in a profit-chasing sector
-
Cider farms to visit this autumn
The Week Recommends With harvest season fast approaching, spend an afternoon at one of these idyllic orchards
-
Endangered shark meat is being mislabeled and sold in the US
Under the radar It could cause both health and ecological problems
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-war
Talking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
Graphic videos of Charlie Kirk’s death renew debate over online censorship
Talking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
Calls for both calm and consequences follow Kirk killing
TALKING POINTS The suspected assassination of far-right activist Charlie Kirk has some public figures pleading for restraint, while others agitate for violent reprisals
-
Why does Donald Trump keep showing up at major sporting events?
Today's Big Question Trump has appeared at the Super Bowl, the Daytona 500 and other events
-
‘Democracy is under threat globally’
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Former top FBI agents sue, claiming Trump purge
Speed Read The agents alleged they were targeted by a “campaign of retribution”
-
Why does Trump keep interfering in the NYC mayoral race?
Today's Big Question The president has seemingly taken an outsized interest in his hometown elections, but are his efforts to block Zohran Mamdani about political expediency or something deeper?
-
Judge lets Cook stay at Fed while appealing ouster
Speed Read Trump had attempted to fire Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud