The Jan. 6 committee won't find a smoking gun


Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Capitol insurrection, and the Jan. 6 committee is still plugging away. Just this week, the panel announced that it wants to interview Sean Hannity, whose stressed-out behind-the-scenes texts about then-President Trump told a very different story from his pronouncements on Fox News. The committee is tangling with Bernard Kerik, the Trump ally who was once the New York City police commissioner, about documents that may shed light on efforts to overturn Joe Biden's election. There's even talk of holding televised hearings in prime time so that the public can see testimony and evidence for themselves.
"The public needs to know, needs to hear from people under oath about what led up to Jan. 6, and to some degree, what has continued after Jan. 6," said the committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).
This is all very important work, of course. But if the goal is to bring about a reckoning about Jan. 6, it's probably not going to work.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Americans already know — if they want to — what happened both on the day of the insurrection and in the preceding months. Joe Biden won the election. Donald Trump lied and said the election was stolen. He tried to get state-level officials to overturn votes. He brought a lot of lawsuits challenging results. He pressured Mike Pence to reject electoral votes. And when all that didn't work, he riled up a crowd of supporters and sent them to the Capitol, then sat silently in the White House while they rampaged.
Nothing about that story has changed in the last year. For the most part, it all happened out in the open. The committee's job is merely to fill in the details. Maybe there will be some high-level criminal prosecutions as a result. Maybe not.
One gets the sense that Trump's detractors still hope there will be a sudden lightbulb moment — when some damning testimony or piece of evidence causes the scales to fall from America's eyes, and the former president's power over his supporters (or the GOP, at least) is finally broken. But that didn't happen after the Access Hollywood tape, nor after Charlottesville, nor after the Mueller Investigation, nor after two impeachments. Indeed, our divisions have only become more intractable over the last year.
There will be no "aha!" moment. There is no smoking gun. There is only us, the American people, and what we choose to do about what we already know.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
3 officers killed in Pennsylvania shooting
Speed Read Police did not share the identities of the officers or the slain suspect, nor the motive or the focus of the still-active investigation
-
Fed cuts interest rates a quarter point
Speed Read ‘The cut suggests a broader shift toward concern about cracks forming in the job market’
-
ABC shelves ‘Kimmel Live’ after Trump FCC threat
Speed Read ‘A free and democratic society cannot silence comedians because the president doesn’t like what they say’
-
ABC shelves ‘Kimmel Live’ after Trump FCC threat
Speed Read ‘A free and democratic society cannot silence comedians because the president doesn’t like what they say’
-
What is Donald Trump’s visit worth to the UK economy?
In the Spotlight Centrepiece of the president’s trip, business-wise, is a ‘technology partnership’
-
Trump’s visit: the mouse and the walrus
Talking Point Britain is keen to point to its own ‘tangible results’, but the US administration has made their demands clear
-
Supreme Court: Will it allow Trump’s tariffs?
Feature Justices fast-track Trump’s appeal to see if his sweeping tariffs are unconstitutional
-
Venezuela: Was Trump’s air strike legal?
Feature A Trump-ordered airstrike targeted a speedboat off the coast of Venezuela, killing all 11 passengers on board
-
3 killed in Trump’s second Venezuelan boat strike
Speed Read Legal experts said Trump had no authority to order extrajudicial executions of noncombatants
-
Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The FBI’s bungled response in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting has director Kash Patel in the hot seat
-
Russian drone tests Romania as Trump spins
Speed Read Trump is ‘resisting congressional plans to impose newer and tougher penalties on Russia’s energy sector’