Florida and other states move to block Chinese citizens from buying US homes
The block comes courtesy of a law that is currently being challenged in Florida's court system


Florida's latest controversy yet again comes thanks to the state's Republican Party, which is currently embroiled in a battle over housing in the Sunshine State. Specifically, Florida is attempting to block Chinese citizens from purchasing homes in the state, citing national security concerns.
This block comes courtesy of a law signed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in 2023. The law stated that allowing Chinese citizens to continue purchasing properties in Florida was creating a threat to national security. Numerous other states have followed Florida's lead, with more than 100 bills at various levels being passed or proposed to limit foreign purchases of homes.
While DeSantis and others have maintained that this law is necessary to preserve national security, opponents have decried it as discriminatory and unconstitutional. The law's enforcement is currently being halted as a fight in Florida's courts over its legality continues.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What does Florida's Chinese housing law entail?
The law, Florida SB 264, was signed by DeSantis in May 2023. The text of the bill prohibits people who are "domiciled" in China but do not have U.S. citizenship from "purchasing or acquiring any interest in real property in the state." The lone exception in the bill is for Chinese holders of non-tourist visas, who may purchase "one residential property that is not on or within five miles of any military installation in the state." Violators of the law can face up to a year in prison.
In addition, Florida's law also carves out blocks for most citizens of Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria and Venezuela. Under SB 264, most citizens of these countries are prevented from "owning or acquiring any interest in real property within 10 miles of any military installation or critical infrastructure in the state." Critical infrastructure in this case refers to locations like airports, refineries and power plants.
SB 264 is part of a "commitment to crack down on Communist China," DeSantis said in a statement during the bill's signing.
What has the reaction to Florida's law been?
Controversy has stemmed over the true purpose of SB 264 — whether it is keeping Floridians safe or being discriminatory toward Chinese people. Many of these Florida residents have "voiced frustrations about being cut off from the ultimate American dream," The New York Times said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
"Every day I am getting phone calls from people asking if they can buy a house under the law," Yukey Hoo, a real estate agent near Orlando, said to the Times. Hoo has had to turn away about a fifth of her normal business because she was unsure if they could legally purchase a home, the Times reported.
Others, however, argue that the law is not meant to be discriminatory but rather to protect national security interests. China "has been clandestinely going after land grabs in the United States," Florida State Rep. David Borrero (R) said to the Times, and "we can't just have that in our backyard. Our national security interests come first." This is despite there being "little evidence of a credible threat considering Chinese interests currently own a miniscule amount of U.S. territory," said Politico.
Amid the controversy, civil rights groups and organizations such as the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are suing Florida over the law. Florida's 11th Circuit Court has temporarily blocked the law's enforcement while a series of appeals are heard. The ACLU has argued that SB 264 is "preempted by federal law because Congress has already established a system of national security review of real estate purchases by foreign nationals."
What other states have made similar efforts?
At least "151 bills restricting property ownership by foreign entities have been considered by 32 states" in 2024, according to the China-U.S. relations organization Committee of 100. Of these 151 bills, 78 would "prohibit Chinese citizens from purchasing or owning property," similar to Florida's SB 264.
Seven of these bills have been passed, including legislation in Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, South Dakota and Utah, plus two in Nebraska, said the Committee. Three of these, Indiana's HB 1183, Nebraska's LB 1301 and South Dakota's HB 1231 "prohibit Chinese citizens from purchasing or owning some form of property."
Overall, since 2023, the year when DeSantis signed SB 264, at least "241 bills restricting property ownership by foreign entities have been considered by 39 states."
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
August 9 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include snake oil salesmen, Ghislaine Maxwell's new residence, and more
-
5 hastily redrawn cartoons about redistricting
Cartoons Artists take on Donald Trump's draughtsmanship, the White House ballroom, and more
-
Bonnie Blue: taking clickbait to extremes
Talking Point Channel 4 claims documentary on the adult performer's attention-grabbing sex stunts is opening up a debate
-
JD Vance rises as MAGA heir apparent
IN THE SPOTLIGHT The vice president is taking an increasingly proactive role in a MAGA movement roiled by scandal and anxious about a post-Trump future
-
Eighty years after Hiroshima: how close is nuclear conflict?
Today's Big Question Eight decades on from the first atomic bomb 'we have blundered into a new age of nuclear perils'
-
Recreation or addiction? Military base slot machines rake in millions.
Under the Radar There are several thousand slot machines on military bases
-
How does the EPA plan to invalidate a core scientific finding?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Administrator Lee Zeldin says he's 'driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion.' But is his plan to undermine a key Obama-era greenhouse gas emissions policy scientifically sound — or politically feasible?
-
Why is the Democratic Party's favorability rating so low?
Talking Points Voters do not like Republican policies. They like Democrats even less.
-
China is building the world's biggest hydropower dam. Is it a 'water bomb' aimed at India?
Today's Big Question River is a 'lifeline for millions' across Asia
-
Knives come out for Pam Bondi
IN THE SPOTLIGHT She wasn't Trump's first pick to lead the Justice Department. After months of scandals and setbacks, is the attorney general's MAGA shelf life winding down?
-
Could Thailand and Cambodia really go to war?
Today's Big Question Thai leader has warned that recent hostilities over border dispute could lead to all-out conflict