Does the Hamas attack threaten Netanyahu's hold on power?
Israel's controversial prime minister presented himself as the the country's protector. Critics say he failed.


Terror attacks often produce a "rally around the flag" effect: Think of George W. Bush’s skyrocketing popularity after 9/11. That may not entirely be the case in Israel after the horrific and deadly attack by Hamas over the weekend. "The disaster that befell Israel on the holiday of Simchat Torah is the clear responsibility of one person: Benjamin Netanyahu," the Israeli newspaper Haaretz editorialized this week. Netanyahu is the longest-tenured prime minister in Israeli history. Is he vulnerable now?
Netanyahu has long presented himself as the best option for Israel’s safety in a dangerous region. Now that claim is in question. "Once billed as Mr. Security, Netanyahu and the Israeli government failed to provide the most basic security needs of Israel’s citizens," David A. Halperin argued at The Jerusalem Post. And Netanyahu may take additional blame if Israelis decide that the massive protests spurred by his attempts at "judicial reform" distracted the country from the threats on its borders. This moment arrives "after months of the fiercest political and societal divisions Israel has ever experienced."
Those critiques may only go so far: The Wall Street Journal reported that Netanyahu and opposition leaders are considering a "unity government" to lead the war effort against Hamas. Even that can be read as a critique of Netanyahu’s right-wing governing coalition: "Prime Minister Netanyahu knows that with the current extreme and dysfunctional security cabinet, he can’t manage a war," said opposition leader Yair Lapid.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the commentators said
The attacks are the "beginning of the end for Netanyahu," William A. Galston argued at The Wall Street Journal. While "now is not the time for recriminations," it is inevitable that a commission of inquiry will eventually examine what went wrong. That will most likely produce "profound changes in Israeli politics." The prime minister has long made the case that he is best equipped to ensure Israel’s safety. "The events of the past few days have undermined this claim."
"Netanyahu can no longer lead the country," Dov S. Zakheim argued at The Hill. Israel’s first priority is to "root out all terrorists from its territory" and "extract the hostages from the terrorists’ grip." But that’s not enough. Netanyahu has "bitterly divided his country" with his attempts to reform the judiciary — reforms that came after (and perhaps because of) his indictments on corruption charges. The prime minister’s "single-minded efforts to avoid criminal prosecution" created such deep divisions that Israel emboldened its "most implacable and bloodthirsty enemies." Now? "Urgent political change" is needed.
Perhaps the proposed wartime unity government gives Netanyahu a shot at political survival, Israel-based Cole S. Aronson wrote in Politico. Israel faces its "worst security crisis in years." A unity government "would benefit him as well as Israel’s unity, security and international standing." Yes, the judicial reform push "has been a political disaster for Netanyahu." The effort was widely seen as an attempt to "specifically disempower liberals." Bringing liberals into government would neutralize those concerns, giving Netanyahu the opportunity "to secure his legacy as the most important Jewish leader since Israel’s founding."
What next?
Financial Times reported Tuesday that Netanyahu’s Likud party "had authorized him to negotiate a unity government" with the center-right National Unity party led by Benny Gantz, a former general. "Our current reality demands we realize that we face a strategic event of critical importance to the State of Israel," Gantz said Sunday. "This is not an operation, this is a war."
In recent years, Shimrit Meir, former senior adviser to ex-Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, wrote in The New York Times, "Israelis instead found themselves engaged in an all-out war — not against terrorists but against themselves." Now it’s clear that Israel cannot "afford the luxury of a vicious internal fight." It is time for unity, but it remains to be seen whether that unity is possible. At Haaretz, the campaign against Netanyahu continues. "Netanyahu must go now," writer Alan Pinkas argued this week. "Not after the Gaza War."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Intimate Apparel: a 'gorgeous, vibrant' production
The Week Recommends Samira Wiley is 'astonishing' in this revival of Lynn Nottage's 'exquisite' seamstress tale
-
King Charles and the Sovereign Grant: how UK taxpayers fund the monarchy
The Explainer Royals received £86.3m from government last year – and they are in line for a 50% increase
-
From Hilde, With Love – the 'moving' story of an accidental revolutionary
The Week Recommends Liv Lisa Fries gives a 'compelling' performance as the soft-spoken heroine.
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
'There are compelling arguments for and against homework'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Are masked ICE agents America's new secret police?
Today's Big Question Critics say masks undermine trust in law enforcement
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
Bibi's back: what will Netanyahu do next?
Today's Big Question Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel's PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election
-
Is Trump sidelining Congress' war powers?
Today's Big Question The Iran attack renews a long-running debate
-
US assessing bomb damage to Iran nuclear sites
Speed Read Trump claims this weekend's US bombing obliterated Tehran's nuclear program, while JD Vance insists the US is 'not at war with Iran'