Judge lets Cook stay at Fed while appealing ouster
Trump had attempted to fire Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud
What happened
A federal court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday night ruled that economist Lisa Cook can remain on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors while she appeals President Donald Trump’s unprecedented attempt to fire her. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb said Trump’s claim that Cook committed mortgage fraud before she joined the Fed was not a “legally permissible cause” for her removal and Cook was not given due process to contest the unsubstantiated allegation.
Who said what
Under the 112-year-old law that established the Federal Reserve, presidents can only fire Fed officials “for cause.” And the “best reading of the ‘for cause’ provision,” Cobb said in her ruling, is that it “extends only to concerns about the board member’s ability to effectively and faithfully execute their statutory duties, in light of events that have occurred while they are in office.”
Justice Department lawyers had argued that the president “had expansive powers to determine what constitutes cause and that the court should be ‘highly deferential’ to that interpretation,” The New York Times said. Cobb’s ruling “marked only the first salvo in what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle” over that question. But it was a “blow” to Trump’s “efforts to assert more control over the traditionally independent Fed” in pursuit of sharply lower interest rates, The Associated Press said.
What next?
Cobb’s decision means Cook “will likely be able to participate” in next week’s Fed rate-setting meeting, The Washington Post said, though the White House suggested it would quickly appeal the ruling. The Senate Banking Committee votes today on whether to advance Trump’s nominee for an open Fed seat, White House economic adviser Stephen Miran, meaning he might also participate in next week’s meeting.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Taps could run dry in drought-stricken TehranUnder the Radar President warns that unless rationing eases water crisis, citizens may have to evacuate the capital
-
Alaska faces earth-shaking loss as seismic monitoring stations shutterIN THE SPOTLIGHT NOAA cuts have left the western seaboard without a crucial resource to measure, understand and predict tsunamis
-
10 great advent calendars for everyone (including the dog)The Week Recommends Countdown with cocktails, jams and Legos
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
Gregory Bovino: the officer leading Trump’s strong-arm immigration tacticsIn the Spotlight He has been referred to as the Border Patrol’s ‘commander-at-large’
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Judge issues injunction on DHS use of forceSpeed Read Agents can only use force under the ‘immediate threat of physical harm’
