South Africa's genocide case puts Israel in the dock
The International Court of Justice in The Hague is hearing a case that could make Israel a 'pariah nation'

The UN's definition of genocide is simple, said The Guardian: "a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part". Proving in court that a genocide is happening, however, is anything but.
Last week, South Africa brought just such a case – alleging that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians – to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. South Africa's opening petition was compelling, said Rob Howse in the LA Times. Israel's military operations since 7 October have resulted in a vast number of civilian casualties: of the 24,000 killed, according to Palestinian sources, 70% are women and children. More than 1.9 million Gazans have been internally displaced, and supplies of food and water profoundly disrupted.
South Africa's lawyers must also prove "genocidal intent", and to this end they adduced nine pages of statements made by PM Benjamin Netanyahu, President Isaac Herzog, Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and others. To take only one example, Netanyahu has invoked the Biblical tale of Amalek, in which Saul was ordered by God to kill its people, without sparing any. The court was shown video of IDF troops chanting "genocidal" slogans, and cheering what seem to be "acts of indiscriminate destruction".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'Sadistic bad taste'
Genocide was created as a legal concept in the wake of the Holocaust, said Charles Moore in The Daily Telegraph. There is "sadistic bad taste" in using it against the state created to prevent a repetition of such a catastrophe. And invoking it in this context is an obscene "inversion of the truth". As too many people seem keen to forget, Hamas unleashed a genocidal attack on 7 October, killing, maiming and raping as many Jews as possible.
By contrast, "Israel's sole battle aim is to destroy Hamas in Gaza". It tries to avoid civilian casualties, even while fighting an enemy that uses them as human shields. The ICJ will take many months to hear this case, but it can order interim measures such as a ceasefire, if it suspects a genocide is occurring. That would make Israel a "pariah nation", and endanger its ability to defend itself. The case is mere "political theatre", said The Wall Street Journal. Where was South Africa's "moral outrage" when it refused to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, or opposed the indictment of Sudan's genocidal dictator Omar al-Bashir?
'Reckless irresponsible statements'
Such arguments, though, are not relevant to the legal issue, said Kenneth Roth in The Guardian. Hamas's genocidal aims are beside the point, "because atrocities by one side do not justify genocide by another". Israel's lawyers have not yet addressed many issues raised by South Africa: the dropping of 2,000lb bombs in civilian areas; the bloodthirsty rhetoric of its leaders.
If nothing else, Israel's "bigmouth" politicians must learn from this case that "words matter", said Haaretz. Real damage can be caused by "reckless, irresponsible statements". The nation is paying the price.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The battle over Jamaican rum
Under The Radar The spirit that defines the Caribbean is at the middle of a legal fight
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Do student loans affect a credit score?
the explainer Repaying loans on time will strengthen your credit — but paying late will hurt it
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Cherry blossom season: Washington diners’ happy time
feature The five best spots to enjoy the festivities
By The Week US Published
-
The EPA: Let’s forget about climate change
Feature You’ll miss the EPA when it’s been gutted, said former EPA heads
By The Week US Published
-
Schumer: Did he betray the Democrats?
Feature 'Schumer had only bad political options'
By The Week US Published
-
Trump's TPS takedown
Feature The president plans to deport a million immigrants with protected status. What effects will that have?
By The Week US Published
-
'A political agenda aimed at reshaping higher education into an ideological stronghold'
instant opinion 'Opinion, comment and editorials of the day'
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Musk: Is Trump putting him on a leash?
Feature Elon Musk’s aggressive government cuts are facing backlash from Trump’s Cabinet
By The Week US Published
-
SCOTUS: A glimmer of independence?
Feature The Supreme Court rejects Trump’s request to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid payments
By The Week US Published
-
DOGE: Wielding a hatchet at the VA
Feature The Trump administration has cut thousands of Veteran Affairs jobs and is considering eliminating 80,000 more
By The Week US Published
-
U.S. aid resumes as Ukraine agrees to cease-fire
Feature As Trump pressures Ukraine, NATO and European allies weigh new strategies
By The Week US Published