South Africa's genocide case puts Israel in the dock
The International Court of Justice in The Hague is hearing a case that could make Israel a 'pariah nation'
The UN's definition of genocide is simple, said The Guardian: "a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part". Proving in court that a genocide is happening, however, is anything but.
Last week, South Africa brought just such a case – alleging that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians – to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. South Africa's opening petition was compelling, said Rob Howse in the LA Times. Israel's military operations since 7 October have resulted in a vast number of civilian casualties: of the 24,000 killed, according to Palestinian sources, 70% are women and children. More than 1.9 million Gazans have been internally displaced, and supplies of food and water profoundly disrupted.
South Africa's lawyers must also prove "genocidal intent", and to this end they adduced nine pages of statements made by PM Benjamin Netanyahu, President Isaac Herzog, Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and others. To take only one example, Netanyahu has invoked the Biblical tale of Amalek, in which Saul was ordered by God to kill its people, without sparing any. The court was shown video of IDF troops chanting "genocidal" slogans, and cheering what seem to be "acts of indiscriminate destruction".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'Sadistic bad taste'
Genocide was created as a legal concept in the wake of the Holocaust, said Charles Moore in The Daily Telegraph. There is "sadistic bad taste" in using it against the state created to prevent a repetition of such a catastrophe. And invoking it in this context is an obscene "inversion of the truth". As too many people seem keen to forget, Hamas unleashed a genocidal attack on 7 October, killing, maiming and raping as many Jews as possible.
By contrast, "Israel's sole battle aim is to destroy Hamas in Gaza". It tries to avoid civilian casualties, even while fighting an enemy that uses them as human shields. The ICJ will take many months to hear this case, but it can order interim measures such as a ceasefire, if it suspects a genocide is occurring. That would make Israel a "pariah nation", and endanger its ability to defend itself. The case is mere "political theatre", said The Wall Street Journal. Where was South Africa's "moral outrage" when it refused to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, or opposed the indictment of Sudan's genocidal dictator Omar al-Bashir?
'Reckless irresponsible statements'
Such arguments, though, are not relevant to the legal issue, said Kenneth Roth in The Guardian. Hamas's genocidal aims are beside the point, "because atrocities by one side do not justify genocide by another". Israel's lawyers have not yet addressed many issues raised by South Africa: the dropping of 2,000lb bombs in civilian areas; the bloodthirsty rhetoric of its leaders.
If nothing else, Israel's "bigmouth" politicians must learn from this case that "words matter", said Haaretz. Real damage can be caused by "reckless, irresponsible statements". The nation is paying the price.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 simple items to help make your airplane seat more comfortable
The Week Recommends Gel cushions and inflatable travel pillows make a world of difference
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
How safe are cruise ships in storms?
The Explainer The vessels are always prepared
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
What message is Trump sending with his Cabinet picks?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION By nominating high-profile loyalists like Matt Gaetz and RFK Jr., is Trump serious about creating a functioning Cabinet, or does he have a different plan in mind?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
US sanctions Israeli West Bank settler group
Speed Read The Biden administration has imposed sanctions on Amana, Israel's largest settlement development organization
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The clown car cabinet
Opinion Even 'Little Marco' towers above his fellow nominees
By Mark Gimein Published
-
What Mike Huckabee means for US-Israel relations
In the Spotlight Some observers are worried that the conservative evangelical minister could be a destabilizing influence on an already volatile region
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The Pentagon faces an uncertain future with Trump
Talking Point The president-elect has nominated conservative commentator Pete Hegseth to lead the Defense Department
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What will Trump mean for the Middle East?
Talking Point President-elect's 'pro-Israel stance' could mask a more complex and unpredictable approach to the region
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Joe Biden's legacy: economically strong, politically disastrous
In Depth The President boosted industry and employment, but 'Bidenomics' proved ineffective to winning the elections
By The Week UK Published
-
How will Elon Musk's alliance with Donald Trump pan out?
The Explainer The billionaire's alliance with Donald Trump is causing concern across liberal America
By The Week UK Published
-
Netanyahu's gambit: axing his own defence minster
Talking Point Sacking of Yoav Gallant demonstrated 'utter contempt' for Israeli public
By The Week UK Published