Why are cluster munitions controversial?

America is sending another deadly weapon to help Ukraine fight Russia. The Associated Press reported the White House has approved Ukraine's request for cluster munitions — bombs and artillery shells that open in the air to release dozens or hundreds of "bomblets" to destroy multiple targets at once. "The Ukrainians have asked for it, other European countries have provided some of that, and the Russians are using it," said Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Ukraine expects to use the munitions as part of its slow-moving counteroffensive against Russia.

The weapons are controversial. The International Committee of the Red Cross said, "Cluster munitions kill and injure large numbers of civilians and cause long-lasting socioeconomic problems." The 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM) prohibited the stockpiling and use of cluster weapons, but neither the United States, Ukraine nor Russia are parties to the treaty.

The American decision has drawn criticism from human rights activists, Al Jazeera reported. "Cluster munitions used by Russia and Ukraine are killing civilians now and will continue to do so for many years," said an official with Human Rights Watch. "Both sides should immediately stop using them and not try to get more of these indiscriminate weapons."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

What are commentators saying?

Giving cluster munitions to Ukraine "might be the only way to save more Ukrainian towns from death and destruction," Josh Rogin wrote for The Washington Post. Human rights groups are right to note the danger of cluster bombs to civilians. The bombs often leave unexploded "duds" behind, making battlefields lethal long after the fighting is over. But Ukrainians understand the downsides. "Because it is their lives on the line, it is their risk to take, and we should honor their request."

"This is a decision the Pentagon should rethink immediately," Hayes Brown wrote for MSNBC. We've already seen the cost of cluster munitions in the Russo-Ukraine war. Russia has used them extensively, killing at least 700 civilians along the way. The people most threatened by more cluster bombs are the same people Ukrainian forces are trying to protect. But the price is too high. The weapons "not only undercut much of the moral high ground the West has taken in the conflict, but it will also threaten the safety of Ukrainian civilians."

"While safety concerns are not irrational, the battlefield is already a deadly place," Morgan Ortagus and Andrew McKenna wrote for The Washington Examiner. Cluster munitions could tip the war in Kyiv's favor and lighten the demand on strained ammunition supplies. Moscow has been "unrestrained" in its use of cluster munitions. "It makes little sense to impose limits on Ukraine while Russia faces no such restrictions."

"Cluster munitions should be off the table if we care about protecting civilian lives," Sera Koulabdara wrote for USA Today. Koulabdara is the chair of the U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines and Cluster Munition Coalition. Cluster munitions can leave behind dangers that last for decades, making it difficult for children to walk safely to school or farmers to plant crops. That remains the case in Laos, which Koulabdara fled after a U.S. bombing campaign in the 1970s. "Let us not contribute to further atrocities by allowing Ukrainian soil to be littered with American cluster bombs."

What's next?

There will be some international opposition to Washington's decision. Reuters reported that Germany has come out against sending cluster munitions to Ukraine. President Joe Biden will have to deal with that opposition from American allies —France, Germany and the U.K. are among the more than 100 countries to sign the CCM — as well as criticism within the ranks of the Democratic Party. The New York Times pointed out that "over the years, many Democrats have led the charge to bar the use of the weapons by American troops."

Ukraine believes the cluster munitions will help its forces press the advantage against Russia with stockpiles of other munitions running low, The Washington Post reported. The Russians "are using them against us," said Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov, "so for our self-defense, we have full right to use the same munition."