Washington Post slams Obama's West Point speech

On the heels of a tainted Memorial Day weekend trip to Afghanistan (where the top CIA agent in Afghanistan was accidentally outed) and bad news from the inspector general's report on the VA, President Obama awoke to another tough development this morning: an editorial in the Washington Post utterly destroying his speech at the West Point graduation ceremony yesterday.

It was blistering. The worst attacks are often on someone's perceived strength, and the Post pulled no punches in pummeling Obama for using his superb rhetorical skills as a crutch and a weapon of obfuscation. The president is accused of responding to valid criticisms "not by adjusting policy but rather by delivering a big speech" — and then of marshaling "a virtual corps of straw men" (essentially setting up a false choice between isolationism and adventurism) in that "big speech."

The most fundamental rebuke is of the so-called "Obama doctrine," which the Post's editorial board clearly felt was unprecedented, somewhat arbitrary, and too restrictive (in terms of narrowly defining the criteria that could trigger future American intervention):

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Next week, President Obama heads to Europe where he will, no doubt, attempt to hit the "reset" button. Again.