Ben Carson suggests presidents can disregard the Supreme Court
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Presidential aspirant Ben Carson said Sunday he wasn't sold on the Supreme Court's longstanding authority to rule on the constitutionality of laws.
"We need to get into a discussion of this because it has changed from the original intent," Carson said on Fox News Sunday.
"The laws of the land, according to our Constitution, are provided by the legislative branch," he added. "The laws of the land are not provided by the judiciary."
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The high court has had the authority to review the constitutionality of laws since the landmark 1803 decision in Marbury v. Madison.
Last week, Carson raised eyebrows by suggesting the executive branch could ignore the Supreme Court's upcoming ruling on same-sex marriage.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
