What Tinder's Twitter meltdown over a Vanity Fair article got right
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Mobile dating app Tinder fanned the flames of outrage surrounding Vanity Fair's apocalyptic "trend piece" on online dating Tuesday night, unleashing a string of tweets criticizing writer Nancy Jo Sales for supposedly biased reporting and incorrect facts. While the rant may have erred toward the self-important — Tinder did, after all, use the tweetstorm to claim that the app is "changing the world" and helping those living under isolated regimes in North Korea and China meet new people — it shouldn't be written off completely, says Jesse Singal at New York.
Sales' article relied heavily on vivid anecdotes to incite moral panic, Singal says, and she brushed aside some of the studies that didn't fit in line with her hypothesis that apps like Tinder are destroying ideas of traditional courtship and marriage and replacing them with meaningless, no-strings-attached flings.
"The problem is that while Sales certainly spins a good yarn, it doesn't really add up to evidence that something revolutionary is afoot," Singal writes. "It's one thing to write an ethnographic piece about Tinder-maters in their natural habitat; it's another to extrapolate this to make sweeping claims about the epochal ways dating and sex are changing." Singal concludes:
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Taking a moral-panic approach to something like mobile online dating makes for a good story, but it also drowns out the opportunity for a richer conversation, and hardens certain false notions about millennial culture. Online dating clearly is changing how many people meet other people and date and have sex. But it's probably changing their behavior in all sorts of different, sometimes conflicting ways. In some cases, it's probably helping people find husbands and wives sooner, leading them to have fewer sex partners. In others, it probably does lead to some decision paralysis and frustration with dating. In many cases, it probably just reinforces the user's pre-existing preferences — pro- or anti-promiscuity, pro– or anti–finding someone to settle down with.But you wouldn't be able to fit "apocalypse" into that headline. [New York]
Read Singal's full analysis at New York.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Samantha Rollins is TheWeek.com's news editor. She has previously worked for The New York Times and TIME and is a graduate of Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.
