Court filing suggests NFL teams violated federal prescription drug laws
A sealed court filing reviewed by The Washington Post reveals teams in the National Football League allegedly violated federal prescription drug laws and failed to comply with Drug Enforcement Administration guidance in their frequent distribution of painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs to players. The filing is part of a federal lawsuit filed by more than 1,800 former players claiming they've suffered health problems due to "improper and deceptive drug distribution practices by NFL teams," The Post reported. The case is slated to go to trial in October.
The documents present evidence that team officials viewed painkillers as "performance-enhancing drugs" necessary to make their team competitive, and that in 2012 the average team "prescribed nearly 5,777 doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 2,213 doses of controlled medications to its players," The Washington Post reported. A longtime Buffalo Bills trainer testified he'd "witnessed team doctors give players injections of prescription medications without telling them what the drug was they were receiving or its side effects." Anthony Yates, former president of the NFL Physicians Society, testified that "a majority of clubs as of 2010 had trainers controlling and handling prescription medications and controlled substances when they should not have."
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said the allegations are "meritless." "The NFL clubs and their medical staffs are all in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act," McCarthy told The Washington Post in an email. "The NFL clubs and their medical staffs continue to put the health and safety of our players first, providing all NFL players with the highest quality medical care. Any claim or suggestion to the contrary is simply wrong."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Read the full story on the allegations at The Washington Post.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Should the right to trial by jury be untouchable?Today’s Big Question With a crown court backlog of around 80,000 cases, David Lammy says ‘status quo cannot go on’
-
Australia’s teens brace for social media banIn The Spotlight Under-16s will be banned from having accounts on major platforms
-
Labour’s dilemma on workers’ rightsThe Explainer TUC says Employment Rights Bill is ‘essential to better quality, more secure jobs’ but critics warn of impact on economic growth
-
ABC News to pay $15M in Trump defamation suitSpeed Read The lawsuit stemmed from George Stephanopoulos' on-air assertion that Trump was found liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll
-
Judge blocks Louisiana 10 Commandments lawSpeed Read U.S. District Judge John deGravelles ruled that a law ordering schools to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms was unconstitutional
-
ATF finalizes rule to close 'gun show loophole'Speed Read Biden moves to expand background checks for gun buyers
-
Hong Kong passes tough new security lawSpeed Read It will allow the government to further suppress all forms of dissent
-
France enshrines abortion rights in constitutionspeed read It became the first country to make abortion a constitutional right
-
Texas executes man despite contested evidenceSpeed Read Texas rejected calls for a rehearing of Ivan Cantu's case amid recanted testimony and allegations of suppressed exculpatory evidence
-
Supreme Court wary of state social media regulationsSpeed Read A majority of justices appeared skeptical that Texas and Florida were lawfully protecting the free speech rights of users
-
Greece legalizes same-sex marriageSpeed Read Greece becomes the first Orthodox Christian country to enshrine marriage equality in law