The Democrats' impeachment push may rest on this one House vote


Democrats are set to vote Wednesday on who should serve as the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, a decision expedited after the former ranking member, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), abruptly stepped down following sexual harassment allegations. The vote could be hugely consequential if the Democrats beat the odds in 2018 and take back the House, as the leader of the Judiciary Committee "historically holds the keys to the impeachment process," Politico writes.
Wednesday's vote comes down to two longtime Judiciary Committee members: Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.). Although Lofgren denies either she or Nadler is "running as an impeachment candidate," she notably has experience in the matter, having been involved in impeachment proceedings against President Richard Nixon and investigating President Bill Clinton.
Nadler, like Lofgren, said he would approach a potential impeachment with an abundance of caution — and Republican support. "There's not much point in impeaching a president and having him acquitted in the Senate as happened with Clinton," he told Politico. He added that while some Democrats are considering impeachment, his immediate concern is how Trump reacts to the investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. "I think I'd be better at the helm of the Judiciary Committee, in terms of forcefulness, in terms of constitutional issues," he explained.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Read more about the candidates and how they would approach a potential Trump impeachment at Politico.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeva Lange was the executive editor at TheWeek.com. She formerly served as The Week's deputy editor and culture critic. She is also a contributor to Screen Slate, and her writing has appeared in The New York Daily News, The Awl, Vice, and Gothamist, among other publications. Jeva lives in New York City. Follow her on Twitter.
-
Prince Andrew: is the royal family doing enough?
Today’s Big Question King Charles faces calls for tougher action against Andrew after latest allegations about Virginia Giuffre and Jeffrey Epstein
-
What are V levels?
The Explainer Government proposals aim to ‘streamline’ post-GCSE education options
-
Larry Ellison: the billionaire’s burgeoning media empire
In the Spotlight Oracle founder’s takeover of traditional and new media companies labelled ‘dangerous for democracy’ by US press watchdog
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rallies
Speed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
DOJ indicts John Bolton over classified files
Speed Read Continuing the trend of going after his political enemies, Trump prosecutes his former national security adviser
-
Trump, Putin set summit as Zelenskyy lands in DC
Speed Read Trump and Putin have agreed to meet in Budapest soon to discuss ending the war in Ukraine
-
Courts deal setbacks to Trump’s Chicago operations
Speed Read President Donald Trump cannot deploy the National Guard in Illinois
-
Pentagon reporters turn in badges after refusing rules
Speed Read They refused to sign a restrictive new press policy imposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
-
Supreme Court points to gutting Voting Rights Act
speed read States would no longer be required to consider race when drawing congressional maps
-
Trump says he authorized covert CIA ops in Venezuela
Speed Read He is also considering military strikes inside the country
-
‘Vile, racist’ leaked chats roil Young Republicans
Speed Read Leaders of Young Republican groups made racist, antisemitic and violent comments in private chats