Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey says new border deal doesn't fund new border wall. 'These are fences.'
On Monday night, the top four congressional negotiators trying to hammer out a border deal before Friday — Sens. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Reps. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) and Kay Granger (R-Texas) — said they have reached an "agreement in principle." The reported details include $1.375 billion for 55 miles of new steel border fencing, funding for 40,520 ICE detention beds, and a $1.7 billion increase in Homeland Security Department border-related funding.
On Tuesday morning, Lowey told CNN's Alisyn Camerota that "as we left the conference, we all agreed that we weren't going to release the details. But it sounds to me as you have a good number of the details." The deal "is a compromise — no one got everything they wanted," she added. Still, "55 miles of a barrier?" Camerota asked. "What makes you think the president is going to sign this?" Lowey didn't have a direct answer.
Camerota also wanted to square the $1.375 billion with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) statement that Trump wouldn't get any money for a border wall. "Well, you're describing it, I guess you got word from the negotiation," Lowey said. "This is not a wall. This is a barrier. These are fences."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
One Republican source disputed some of the details, telling Politico the $1.375 billion can be used for "new miles of border wall," for example. Shelby and Lowey said Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have approved the deal.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
‘Congratulations on your house, but maybe try a greyhound instead’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How climate change poses a national security threatThe explainer A global problem causing more global problems
-
The 5 best TV shows about the mobThe Week Recommends From the show that launched TV’s golden age to a Batman spin-off, viewers can’t get enough of these magnificent mobsters
-
Nobody seems surprised Wagner's Prigozhin died under suspicious circumstancesSpeed Read
-
Western mountain climbers allegedly left Pakistani porter to die on K2Speed Read
-
'Circular saw blades' divide controversial Rio Grande buoys installed by Texas governorSpeed Read
-
Los Angeles city workers stage 1-day walkout over labor conditionsSpeed Read
-
Mega Millions jackpot climbs to an estimated $1.55 billionSpeed Read
-
Bangladesh dealing with worst dengue fever outbreak on recordSpeed Read
-
Glacial outburst flooding in Juneau destroys homesSpeed Read
-
Scotland seeking 'monster hunters' to search for fabled Loch Ness creatureSpeed Read
