Flood prevention: deal imminent for new homes
Four-year standoff betweeen developers, authorities and environmentalists may be coming to an end
A FOUR-YEAR standoff between developers and authorities, over rules designed to prevent new housing projects from exacerbating the effects of flooding, appears to be a step closer to a resolution today. But what are the rules, why are they contentious and what form will a deal take? Here are five key questions:
What caused the standoff?
Building policy has been "paralysed" since the Flood Act of 2010 was written into law, says the BBC. The act requires developers to landscape their projects so that rain water collects in "ponds and grassy hollows" or seeps into open ground rather than rushing into the drainage system.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Detailed rules governing the implementation of the act are being drawn up by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). But the governance has been repeatedly delayed by two factors. Firstly, a standoff between developers and environmentalists on the best way to ensure run-off doesn't contribute to flooding. And, secondly, by the £500 million budget cuts at Defra and the resulting staff reshuffles which have cause bureaucratic delays.
Why are developers unhappy?
It all comes down to money. Developers argue that allocating valuable building land to ponds and the like will drive up the cost of the housing, make homes less affordable and projects less viable from a commercial perspective.
What do the developers propose?
They want some "flexibility" under the terms of the Act, the BBC says. For example, they suggest run-off could be captured using giant underground tanks, an approach that would free-up more land for development.
What's wrong with that proposal?
Well, according to technical experts, the tanks are an inferior solution compared to "surface features" such as ponds. Drainage expert Paul Shaffer tells the BBC: "There are much greater benefits if you capture water on the surface".
He adds: "It's a simpler solution that's easier to maintain; you get pollutants broken down free of charge by vegetation, you get amenity value that improves people's quality of life, you help to improve biodiversity." Surface features also help to cool down the surrounding land during heatwaves, Shaffer says.
So, has the standoff been solved?
Not exactly. There is still "deadlock" over the land allocation issue, but the BBC understands that an important deal has been reached over who pays to maintain any new "anti-flood landscape features".
Under the terms of the deal, councils will be able to charge the owners of new homes for the maintenance of anti-flood landscaping. The councils believe that’s a fair solution because the owners of established homes have to pay to have their run-off treated by water firms through the sewerage system.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Magnificent Tudor castles and stately homes to visit this year
The Week Recommends The return of 'Wolf Hall' has sparked an uptick in visits to Britain's Tudor palaces
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
I'm a Celebrity 2024: 'utterly bereft of new ideas'?
Talking Point Coleen Rooney is the star attraction but latest iteration of reality show is a case of 'rinse and repeat'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
The clown car cabinet
Opinion Even 'Little Marco' towers above his fellow nominees
By Mark Gimein Published
-
‘A change in grading could be a timely and useful way for the government to ‘reset’ A-levels’
Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis and commentary from the British and international press
By The best columns Published
-
‘Geronimo the alpaca is irresistibly cute - hence the public outcry’
Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis and commentary from the British and international press
By The best columns Published
-
‘The ‘party elite’ designed the rules - and alongside them the get-out clauses’
Instant Opinion Your digest of analysis and commentary from the British and international press
By The best columns Published
-
Instant Opinion: men ‘getting away with murder’ using ‘rough sex defence’
In Depth Your guide to the best columns and commentary on Friday 15 November
By Gabriel Power Published
-
VIDEO: ‘Once in a millennium’ flood ravages Maryland town
Speed Read National Guardsman missing after being swept away by rushing water in Ellicott City
By The Week Staff Published
-
Almost a third of Tube stations 'at risk of flooding'
Speed Read 'Only a matter of time' before heavy rainfall strikes London's transport network, report warns
By The Week Staff Published
-
Cameron pledges £40m to bolster 'overwhelmed' flood defences
Speed Read Extra spending comes after claims of 'full-level mismanagement' at Environment Agency
By The Week Staff Published
-
Storm Desmond: is climate change to blame?
Speed Read Government faces questions over cuts and failed flood defences as the clean-up operation continues
By The Week Staff Last updated