A powerful group of MPs has criticised a new plan to allow the UK tax authority to take money directly from millions of people’s bank accounts.
Chancellor George Osborne laid out plans for the scheme in the Budget, granting new confiscatory powers to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to recover debt from anyone who owes more than £1,000. This would allow the tax authority to seize money directly from debtors’ accounts, The Independent reports.
In a report on this year’s Budget, the cross-party Treasury Committee criticised the plan and expressed concerns over HMRC’s history of making mistakes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The proposal to grant HMRC the power to recover money directly from taxpayers’ bank accounts is of considerable concern to the committee,” the report said. “The committee considers a lengthy and full consultation to be essential.
“Giving HMRC this power without some form of prior independent oversight – for example by a new ombudsman or tribunal, or through the courts – would be wholly unacceptable.”
The committee said it was particularly concerned about the plan because of HMRC’s past history of sometimes failing to calculate tax bills accurately.
“People should pay the right amount of tax. But HMRC does not always ask for the right amount”, said committee chairman Andrew Tyrie.
Another committee member, Mark Garnier, a Conservative MP, told the BBC that he had serious concerns about changes to the current system. “What we worry about is... that essentially HMRC will be acting as judge and jury,” he said.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales said the plans are “of considerable concern to many taxpayers and accountants”. The institute’s head of taxation, Frank Haskew, warned that the changes may even be illegal, The Times reports.
He noted that it was “a fundamental tenet of our English law and our democratic society” that money “cannot be grabbed from somebody’s account without a judge agreeing to the move”.
-
How is Chili's saving casual dining? Could others follow?Today's Big Question Value and TikTok virality bring in the diners
-
NASA is abandoning the climateThe Explainer Climate missions could be going dark
-
Every MCU movie since 'Avengers: Endgame,' rankedThe Week Recommends How did the recent 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' stack up?
-
Do Tory tax cuts herald return of austerity?Today's Big Question Chancellor U-turns on scrapping top rate tax but urges ministers to make public spending cuts
-
Labour shortages: the ‘most urgent problem’ facing the UK economy right nowSpeed Read Britain is currently in the grip of an ‘employment crisis’
-
Will the energy war hurt Europe more than Russia?Speed Read European Commission proposes a total ban on Russian oil
-
Will Elon Musk manage to take over Twitter?Speed Read The world’s richest man has launched a hostile takeover bid worth $43bn
-
Shoppers urged not to buy into dodgy Black Friday dealsSpeed Read Consumer watchdog says better prices can be had on most of the so-called bargain offers
-
Ryanair: readying for departure from LondonSpeed Read Plans to delist Ryanair from the London Stock Exchange could spell ‘another blow’ to the ‘dwindling’ London market
-
Out of fashion: Asos ‘curse’ has struck againSpeed Read Share price tumbles following the departure of CEO Nick Beighton
-
Universal Music’s blockbuster listing: don’t stop me now…Speed Read Investors are betting heavily that the ‘boom in music streaming’, which has transformed Universal’s fortunes, ‘still has a long way to go’
