What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
A precise attack could destroy Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into another drawn-out war
As Donald Trump keeps the world waiting, experts believe a US attack on Iran could pull Washington into a conflict even more perilous and lengthy than the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Some Iranian officials have said that Tehran has already prepared itself for a "full-blown, drawn-out war", said CNN, a military confrontation that would then dominate – and possibly outlast – Trump's presidency.
Trump's own camp is divided over whether to launch the US air force's "bunker buster" (or Ordnance Penetrator) missiles. They are the only weapons with the capability of hitting Fordow, Iran's most critical nuclear site, a uranium enrichment facility that's buried in a mountain.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Israel is dominating the air space over Iran but destroying Iran's nuclear capability requires "the kind of air attack that only the US air force can execute", said The New York Times. But US involvement could push Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to double down and start producing – and possibly even using – nuclear bombs.
What did the commentators say?
Escalation could happen quickly. "Any attack by the US will lead to a full-scale attack by the Iranians against US bases in the region," Trita Parsi, from the Quincy Institute foreign policy think tank in Washington, told CNN.
These bases are within easier missile reach of Iran than the targets that it is attempting to hit in Israel. If Americans are killed, or even injured, the US president will be under pressure to exact revenge.
"Soon enough, the only targets left for Washington to hit would be the Iranian regime's leaders, and the US would again go into the regime-change business," wrote former US ambassador to Israel Daniel C. Kurtzer and former National Security Council member Steven N. Simon on Foreign Affairs.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Unable to defeat Israel and the US through outright firepower, Iran would mobilise what remains of its proxies across Iraq, Yemen and Syria and try to exhaust its enemies in a war of attrition, as it did against Saddam Hussein's Iraq in the 1980s.
Nowadays, said Parsi, it would use cyberwarfare, drones and short-range missile attacks on oil tankers, which would make transportation in the Persian Gulf difficult, thereby driving up the price of oil, a way to hurt Trump at home. "The Iranian strategy may end up being just to try to sustain themselves, strike back as much as they can, and hope that Trump eventually tries to cut the war short, as he did in Yemen," Parsi said. Last month, the US signed a ceasefire deal with Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels.
Tehran could also try to shut down trade and shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab al-Mandab Strait, both global maritime chokepoints. The US could retaliate by bombing Iran's own oil industry, but that would make the "oil shock to the global economy even more severe", said Max Boot in The Washington Post.
What next?
At this week's G7 summit in Canada, French president Emmanuel Macron cautioned against "regime change with no plan" and pointed to Iraq in 2003 and the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya in 2011 as cautionary examples.
"As Tony Blair was warned by Iraq experts in 2002 – but decided to ignore – the removal of a longstanding authoritarian government unleashes unpredictable suppressed forces," said The Guardian. Disagreeing with Macron, Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, said: "We are dealing with a terrorist regime both internally and externally. It would be good if this regime came to an end."
If Iran's supreme leader were to be toppled, the country, which is made up of a mixture of ethnicities, religions, politics and incomes, could end up divided in a sort of Balkanisation. "Even now, as the regime totters, the uncertainty about what may come next may be its best chance of survival."
Potential replacements for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei include Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was overthrown during the 1979 revolution. He left Iran at the age of 17 but this week has been on US TV saying: "We see a leader who is hiding in a bunker like a rat. I have stepped in to lead this campaign at the behest of my compatriots. I have a plan for Iran's future and recovery."
-
The battle over the Irish language in Northern IrelandUnder the Radar Popularity is soaring across Northern Ireland, but dual-language sign policies agitate division as unionists accuse nationalists of cultural erosion
-
Villa Treville Positano: a glamorous sanctuary on the Amalfi CoastThe Week Recommends Franco Zeffirelli’s former private estate is now one of Italy’s most exclusive hotels
-
How roadkill is a surprising boon to scientific researchUnder the radar We can learn from animals without trapping and capturing them
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
Ukraine, US and Russia: do rare trilateral talks mean peace is possible?Rush to meet signals potential agreement but scepticism of Russian motives remain
-
Trump backs off Greenland threats, declares ‘deal’Speed Read Trump and NATO have ‘formed the framework for a future deal,’ the president claimed
-
Iran unleashes carnage on its own peopleFeature Demonstrations began in late December as an economic protest
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
Iran in flames: will the regime be toppled?In Depth The moral case for removing the ayatollahs is clear, but what a post-regime Iran would look like is anything but
-
Europe moves troops to Greenland as Trump fixatesSpeed Read Foreign ministers of Greenland and Denmark met at the White House yesterday
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult