Restricting abortion: 5 most controversial debates
Republican leaders at both the state and federal levels are making limiting abortion a big priority
GOP lawmakers at both the state and federal level have made fighting abortion a priority in the new year. A Planned Parenthood sting last month, in which men entered 12 locations in six states posing as pimps for child prostitutes, has added further fuel to the reproductive-rights battles, leading Slate's David Weigel to declare last week "Abortion Week." Here are five current points of debate among lawmakers:
1. Heartbeats
Ohio lawmakers are considering the "heartbeat" bill, a measure that would ban abortion once the fetal heartbeat can be detected. That can be as early as 18 days into a pregnancy, so the proposal would make for the strictest abortion law in the country. "The idea is a beating heart would not be stopped by abortion," says Diana Stover, the head of Northeast Ohio Value Voters, a group backing the bill. But such a restriction would be equal to an abortion ban, says Kellie Copeland of the pro-choice group NARAL. "Most women don't know they are pregnant at that point. It would give them no opportunity to learn they were pregnant and make a decision." Ohio lawmakers are also considering bills that would ban late-term abortion and enforce stricter parental consent rules.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
2. Race and sex selection
Arizona lawmakers last week introduced bills that would ban abortion for reasons of racial or sex selection, and require women seeking abortions to sign an affidavit saying they are not doing so because of the fetus' sex or race. A similar bill was introduced in Georgia last year, but never made it past a House committee. "These race and sex selection bills are part of a growing meme in the anti-choice movement — targeting abortion as so-called 'black genocide,' along with drawing comparisons between abortion and slavery," says Miriam Zoila Pérez in The Indypendent. No, the bottom line is that it's "never right to abort a child because it's supposedly the wrong sex or race," says Sydney Hay, a Republican candidate for Congress in 2010 who testified in support of the bill. Arizona has an opportunity to "lead the nation" by passing this law.
3. Required sonograms
The Texas Senate is considering a bill that would require doctors to perform a sonogram on women seeking abortions, although a recent change to the bill would allow a woman to opt out of looking at the sonogram or hearing the heartbeat. Republican State Sen. Dan Patrick, who sponsored the legislation, says he hopes that seeing the sonogram and hearing the heartbeat may lead some women to change their minds and say, "You know what? That's my baby." This is a textbook "example of government overreach," said the ACLU of Texas in a statement. Earlier this week, the Wyoming House gave preliminary approval to a bill that would require doctors to inform women that they have the option of viewing an ultrasound of their fetus.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
4. Late-term abortions
A bill pending in the Iowa House would ban abortion after the 20th week of pregnancy, unless the mother's health is at risk. A 20-week law went into effect in neighboring Nebraska last October, and similar measures are in the works in Indiana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and other states. Iowa House Speaker Kraig Paulsen says this issue is urgent, as doctors from Nebraska could move into the state with the aim of performing late-term abortions.
5. Federal funding
Republicans in Congress are pushing several pieces of legislation that would limit federal funding for abortions. The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act would permanently ban the use of federal money to subsidize abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the mother's life. The bill would also deny tax credits to employers who offer insurance plans that cover abortion. Meanwhile, the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act would cut off hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to Planned Parenthood and other organizations that provide abortions. Critics note that organizations like Planned Parenthood reserve the federal money that they receive for women's health and family planning services, not abortions.
-
Today's political cartoons - November 23, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - qualifications, tax cuts, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Long summer days in Iceland's highlands
The Week Recommends While many parts of this volcanic island are barren, there is a 'desolate beauty' to be found in every corner
By The Week UK Published
-
The Democrats: time for wholesale reform?
Talking Point In the 'wreckage' of the election, the party must decide how to rebuild
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published