uesday marks the 10-year anniversary of the Iraq war. The cost of that military adventure? Approximately 190,000 dead soldiers, contractors, and civilians, and a $2.2 trillion bill for American taxpayers, according to a recent report from Brown University. Specifically, the research was conducted by "30 economists, anthropologists, lawyers, humanitarian personnel, and political scientists from 15 universities, the United Nations, and other organizations."
The initial cost estimate by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget in 2002: $60 billion. As we previously reported, that's the amount the United States ended up spending on reconstruction efforts alone, with $8 billion of it being wasted outright. The $2.2 trillion number cited by Brown includes the cost of caring for veterans, and could climb to $3.9 trillion by 2053 thanks to cumulative interest on borrowed funds.
As for the 190,000 dead: Roughly 134,000 of them were Iraqi civilians.
Obviously, those numbers are pretty staggering. And they raise an obvious question: Was it worth it? Not according to the researchers. Reuters sums up the findings:
The report concluded the United States gained little from the war while Iraq was traumatized by it. The war reinvigorated radical Islamist militants in the region, set back women’s rights, and weakened an already precarious healthcare system, the report said. [Reuters]
Particularly alarming, the report says, is the lack of access to healthcare after "more than half of Iraq’s medical doctors left the country during the 2000s."
Of course, plenty of people see the Iraq war as something of a success, albeit a costly one. And certainly, in the bloody days before the successful surge and Sunni awakening, it seemed that Iraq might never achieve the relative stability and fragile peace it has today. And, as Victoria Nuland, spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, notes, U.S.-Iraq ties have at least improved.
Compared to where we were in the Saddam era, we now have a bilateral security agreement. We have deep economic interests and ties. We have a security relationship. We have a political relationship. [Stars and Stripes]
Of course, Saddam Hussein had few admirers. But did the United States really achieve its goal of making Iraq a free and democratic country? Not really, says the report. Iraq ranks 112th out of 165 countries in the Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index — classified somewhere between a "flawed democracy" and an "authoritarian regime."
And while things are better today than they were in, say, 2006, it's not like today's Iraq is violence-free. The same morning that the new figures were released, Reuters reported that coordinated blasts killed 25 people near the Green Zone in Baghdad.
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- WATCH: Suspect defends brutal beheading of London man in broad daylight
- 32 TV shows to watch in 2013 [Updated]
- Is Greek yogurt hurting the environment?
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- WATCH: Jon Stewart and Bill O'Reilly spar over the Obama scandals
- Want to make money off Bitcoin mining? Hint: Don't mine
- 'The Choom Gang': 9 juiciest details from Barack Obama's days as a pothead
- Sadly, you are uglier than you think
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- The politics behind Kanye West's 'New Slaves'
- Are we on the cusp of a solar energy boom?
- Why Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn doesn't want tornado relief money
- WATCH: Jon Stewart hates everyone in Washington now
- LIVE UPDATES: Massive tornado tears through Oklahoma City area
- Angry at the government? 5 ways you can fight back
- 7 purported health benefits of drinking coffee
- What is a quantum computer — and why does Google need one?
- Why NASA is funding a 3D pizza printer
- The cool backstory of the Slurpee
|
||
|
The daily gossip: Paris Hilton is releasing another album, and more |
|
|
The daily gossip: Seth MacFarlane definitely won't be hosting the Oscars next year, and more |
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||













