The simplified ObamaCare application: Will it silence critics?
The new form is supposed to take make getting insurance coverage less of a headache
On Tuesday, the Department of Health and Human Services revealed a slimmer version of the application to request health insurance through the Affordable Care Act.
The change drops the application's length from 21 pages to three for individuals, and seven for families. The forms (and really the entire ACA) had been criticized as too complex and unwieldy, prompting the White House to make the tweak.
"We're hoping to move as many people as possible to the e-mail application form," an Obama administration official told TIME. "We received a lot of [negative] feedback from insurers and individuals like you when we published the first application forms, and we’re trying to be responsive to those concerns."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to the White House, their timed tests showed people completing the streamlined form in seven minutes on average. In a press conference Tuesday, President Obama said that put the forms "well below the industry average."
The forms are used to help people determine if they're eligible to purchase private insurance through a health care exchange, an online marketplace where insurance companies will, in theory, bid against each other for potential customers. But determining eligibility is a complex process involving multiple departments of the federal government, including the IRS. As the Washington Post's Sarah Kliff notes, an entire page in the old form was used to determine if applicants were Alaska natives.
The application's length, as well as other potential speed bumps in implementing the exchanges (they're supposed to be up and running come October), have led even some Democratic lawmakers to pan them altogether. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), for one, called the rollout a "train wreck."
So how far will the change go in placating critics, if at all?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Families USA head Ron Pollack, a supporter of the law who had been a vocal critic of the first form, praised the new version for its simplicity.
"The revised Affordable Care Act application forms deserve applause because they will streamline the enrollment process and make it consumer-friendly," he said in a statement. "These streamlined and shortened forms significantly improve the likelihood that large numbers of people will truly get enrolled and gain access to affordable health coverage."
However, while the form is surely simpler for individuals, it may actually now be more complex for large families, says Ezra Klein at The Washington Post. The basic family form covers only two people, so families of three or more will have to make extra copies of some sections, raising the final page count.
"So the new form really is less intimidating for single adults, who now get an application catering to them," Klein says. "But it's a bigger pain in the neck for a family of four, who now get an application catering to families of two — and to a media that equates fewer pages with better forms and laws. As larger families will now find out, shorter and simpler are not actually synonyms."
Still, TIME's Joe Klein, who'd previously warned that "ObamaCare will fail if [Obama] doesn’t start paying more attention to the details of implementation," says the change is a welcome one, because it shows the White House is at least open to tinkering with the program to make it better serve consumers.
The White House will likely make more changes to the insurance exchange aspect of the ACA going forward. Obama himself said as much Tuesday, acknowledging, "Even if we do everything perfectly, there'll still be, you know, glitches and bumps."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
Major League Baseball is facing an epidemic of pitcher's injuries
Under the Radar Many insiders are blaming the pitch clock for the rise in injuries — but the league is not so sure
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
8 movie musicals that prove the screen can share the stage
The Week Recommends The singing and dancing, bigger than life itself
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
2024 Mother's Day Gift Guide
The Week Recommends A present for every mom
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published