RSS
The end of debt-ceiling brinksmanship should make you nervous
Yes, John Boehner brought an (at least temporary) end to debt ceiling hostage-taking. But the Tea Party isn't dead.
Boehner prevailed, but at what cost?
Boehner prevailed, but at what cost? (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
O

n Tuesday evening, the House voted to raise the U.S. debt ceiling, extending federal borrowing authority until about March 2015. The "clean" debt limit bill — without any added legislation or demands — passed by a vote of 221 to 201, with only 28 Republicans joining all but two Democrats to send the bill to the Senate, where passage is almost assured.

That means the U.S. won't default on its financial obligations before the 2014 midterm elections, but it has a larger significance, too: The Republican strategy of demanding steep spending cuts or other concessions in return for raising the debt ceiling is dead. Kaput. On Tuesday, after three years of brinksmanship, pledges, and partisan warfare, "it abruptly vanished, the victim of Republican disunity and a president determined not to bargain again," says Jim Kuhnhenn at The Associated Press.

There are a lot of plausible explanations for why House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) abruptly decided to drop all of the proposed GOP demands and bring a clean bill to the floor. It's the fruit of the GOP's disastrous government shutdown and President Obama and the Democrats' belated decision in the last two debt limit fights "to refuse to negotiate with Republicans," says Greg Sargent at The Washington Post. Slate's David Weigel notes that Boehner never thought debt limit brinksmanship was a good strategy. ("Really, he didn't," Weigel adds, citing a December 2010 interview.)

It's also largely true that Boehner didn't have a lot of good options this time, since his House GOP caucus couldn't agree on what measures to insist on in return for a debt ceiling hike. "When the Republicans have 218 votes they can either accomplish limited aims or at least make Democrats take embarrassing votes," says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. "With the hard-liners making mischief they get nothing."

Whatever the reason, House Republicans appear to have turned a page. We don't have to hear about the dangers of a default for another year, hopefully longer. Crisis averted, perhaps permanently. Boehner has apparently taken the lesson that trying to appease the "hell no" faction in his caucus is bad for Republicans and bad for the country.

But while probably quite a few of the 199 Republicans who voted no are quietly glad the bill passed — some of them said as much — there is still a significant portion of the House GOP caucus that is upset Boehner pushed through a clean debt ceiling increase. For convenience's sake, let's call that the Tea Party bloc. The usual conservative suspects — the Club for Growth, Heritage Action, the Senate Conservative Fund, the Tea Party Patriots — excoriated Boehner for capitulating on the debt ceiling.

And here's the thing: Boehner's Tea Party wing is still in Congress, and after losing its recent bids to sink the December 2013 bipartisan budget deal, last month's $1.1 trillion spending bill, and the farm bill, there's a lot of anger bubbling up on the Right.

Passing bipartisan compromises and raising spending authority are the kinds of business-as-usual practices that helped fuel the Tea Party movement in the first place. All House members, but especially the Republicans who won their seats in the GOP wave of 2010, are facing their voters again this fall. Anger and fear for your political career aren't a great combination for maintaining relative peace in Washington.

And if Bohener has sidelined the Tea Partiers, he hasn't neutered them. At best, "the emerging dynamic is one where the Tea Party can no longer hold the basic functions of government hostage to conservative policy reforms, but has effective veto power over major new proposals that require bipartisan deal-making," says Sahil Kapur at Talking Points Memo. "Boehner only took back some of his power — just enough to halt the spiral of self-defeating confrontations. The Tea Party wields the rest."

Maybe House conservatives will channel their frustrations toward increasing the GOP majority in the House and taking the Senate, as Michael Schaus advises at Townhall:

Go ahead, blame "the GOP establishment." Blame John Boehner. Blame the 28 House Republicans who, for some inexplicable reason, decided that voting with the opposition party was the reason they were sent to Washington. But remember that the overwhelming majority of the GOP stuck by their promise to rein in the national debt. In the end, the only thing that could have helped avoid a "clean" debt increase would be fewer Democrats.... Regardless of what "could have been," the debate is now on hold until after the midterm elections. [Townhall]

Or maybe they will take their anger out on Boehner, trying to install a less accommodating House speaker in his place (though TIME's Jay Newton-Small argues that "Boehner's speakership is more secure than ever" after the debt ceiling vote).

Those are the somewhat rational reasons to be wary of this winter calm. But there's something more intangible at play. In the past two months, Washington really has returned to something like normal order, with budgets, a handful of bipartisan deals leading to broadly acceptable legislation, and even a modicum of bipartisan laughter. After so many years of bitter partisan warfare, that seems too quick, too easy.

Call it political PTSD, or frayed nerves, or unwarranted pessimism, but it sure feels like there's another shoe hanging up there, waiting to drop.

Peter Weber is a senior editor at TheWeek.com, and has handled the editorial night shift since 2008. A graduate of Northwestern University, Peter has worked at Facts on File and The New York Times Magazine. He speaks Spanish and Italian, and plays in an Austin rock band.

EDITORS' PICKS

THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER

Subscribe to the Week