Watch Jon Stewart and Bill O'Reilly solve the government shutdown
The cable news frenemies face off again on The Daily Show, and they have a remarkably productive fight over ObamaCare
Slate's Joshua Keating has an interesting article imagining how farcical the U.S. government shutdown would look if American journalists were reporting on it happening in another country. But Americans already think the shutdown is ridiculous: A new CNN/ORC International poll has Congress' approval rating at an all-time low of 10 percent, and record-high disapproval ratings for both parties.
The Daily Show's Jon Stewart shares America's disdain for the dysfunctional Congress, but he's not willing to declare a pox on both houses. On Monday night's show, with the shutdown an all-but-foregone conclusion, Stewart placed the blame for the shutdown squarely on House Republicans.
Trying to undo ObamaCare, passed lawfully by Congress and upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, he said, is like the New York Giants losing their Sunday football game by three touchdowns, then demanding: "If you don't give us 25 more points by midnight on Monday, we will shut down the f--king NFL." He breaks out the Schoolhouse Rock! bill-to-law primer to prove his point.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Then, to rub it in, Stewart played a clip of Gene Wilder's Willy Wonka yelling: "You get nothing! You lose! Good day, sir!"
Stewart then turned one of the GOP's talking points — Obama will negotiate with Iran but not with Republicans — on its head. If Obama can make a deal with "the most intransigent, hard-line, unreasonable, totalitarian mullahs in the world, but not with Republicans, maybe he's not the problem," Stewart argued.
So far, this is prime Stewart doing what he does best: Throwing very persuasive spitballs, and using humor to hammer home his points, uncontested. But serendipitously, Stewart's guest Monday night was frequent sparring partner and Fox News star Bill O'Reilly, on to promote his new book, Killing Jesus. Stewart and O'Reilly discussed the book for a bit, but then the conversation turned to the government shutdown. Fireworks, right?
Not exactly. O'Reilly was more sympathetic than Stewart to the push to at least delay ObamaCare, but he agreed that the government shutdown is pretty asinine. "They're all pinheads," O'Reilly said. Then he pitched what he called a commonsense compromise for solving the ObamaCare standoff. Stewart agreed it's better than what House Republicans are demanding:
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The second part of their interview was on President Obama's handling of Syria, and here we got some real disagreement. As often happens in Stewart's conversations with O'Reilly, the Fox News host tried to play the reasonable adult in the room. The main point of contention was style over substance: Both men agreed that the diplomatic solution the U.S. has happened upon is the best outcome, but O'Reilly was more concerned that the whole showdown makes Obama look weak.
"That's a high school mentality for running a country," Stewart countered. "I don't care if [Obama] put on a dress and lipstick and sashayed his pretty little ass around the White House," he added, in one of the few memorable exchanges of the night. The point was that America avoided a military confrontation. Then O'Reilly insulted John Oliver. Watch:
As a bonus, here's Stewart's introduction of O'Reilly, sort of explaining to his audience why he has his Fox News frenemy on his show so often:
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
5 cartoons of mass destruction about Dick Cheney’s legacyCartoon Artists take on hall of fame, pearly gates, and more
-
What happens to a Democratic Party without Nancy Pelosi?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The storied former speaker of the House is set to retire, leaving congressional Democrats a complicated legacy and an uncertain future
-
The plant-based portfolio diet focuses on heart healthThe Explainer Its guidelines are flexible and vegan-friendly
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
