Obama's deficit reduction speech: First reactions
The president announces plans to cut $4 trillion from the deficit over the next 12 years, with a combination of spending cuts and tax increases. Is this winning the future?
On Wednesday afternoon, the president announced a proposal to reduce the projected U.S. deficit by $4 trillion over the next 12 years, with a combination of spending cuts and targeted tax increases. (Watch an excerpt here.) Obama's plan would slash $750 billion in discretionary spending, save $500 billion by reducing health care waste, and raise revenue by letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire. The president also said that if budget targets weren't met by 2014, a "debt fail-safe" would kick in, forcing even greater spending cuts. Obama labeled the Republican plan proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan a "vision of our future that's deeply pessimistic." In contrast, he said, his plan would enable Americans to "live within our means while still investing in our future." Here, some initial reactions to the president's speech:
It was a passionate defense of liberal values: Obama's speech was an "unapologetic defense of a progressive vision of government," says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly, and included a welcome, "full-throated condemnation" of Ryan's irresponsible plan. Some liberals worry that Obama is afraid to defend "the institutions of the modern welfare state," like Medicare and Medicaid, which Ryan's proposal would radically change. But Obama reminded Americans that the modern welfare state is "worthy of a spirited defense." It was exactly what we needed to hear.
"A spirited defense of a progressive vision"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It was a whole load of nothing: Obama was content to attack "the only viable debt-reduction plan out there," says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post, instead of offering any substantive solutions of his own. No "Social Security fix," no "alternative to top-down rationing of Medicare," no details on how to reform the corporate tax code. Instead, all we got was "more defense cuts and taxes on the rich." Well, that won't solve our problems — nor will it help Obama in 2012.
"The president speaks, says very little"
It wisely aimed for the political center: This was "classic Obama," says Andrew Sullivan at The Daily Beast, offering a "center-left approach" to the "center-right conviction" that painful solutions are required to tackle the debt. He wisely noted the GOP's refusal to "ask anything from the top one percent." "After the cold shock of the Ryan plan," Obama's "less draconian vision" will surely swing the political center back in his direction.
"Live-blogging Obama's moment of fiscal truth"
It was about winning in 2012, not winning the future: The speech sounded "more like the opening salvo of a political campaign" than a bipartisan proposal, says Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. Obama's attack on the Bush tax cuts for the rich was a "purely political move," and his decision to go after Ryan's plan is "clearly making the bet that the American public doesn't want to give up the federal government they've become used to." This wasn't about solving a problem; this was about "laying the groundwork for 2012."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Baltimore bridge disaster: Who is going to pay and how?
Today's Big Question Politicians, legal experts, and the insurance industry are all grappling with the financial fallout of America's worst infrastructure tragedy in years
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Melting polar ice is messing with global timekeeping
Speed Read Ice loss caused by climate change is slowing the Earth's rotation
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The Week contest: Stick guitar
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published