Health care reform: Is repealing it worth $230 billion?
A congressional agency says the GOP proposal to scrap the Affordable Care Act would add to the deficit. So are Republicans being hypocritical by pushing for repeal?
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday that repealing health care reform would add $230 billion to the federal deficit over the next decade, intensifying debate over House Republicans' bid to scrap the law. Democrats seized on the figures to argue that the GOP cares more about partisan politics than fiscal discipline. The new House speaker, John Boehner (R-Ohio), questioned the accounting and countered that replacing "the Washington Democrats' job-killing health care law" with "common-sense reforms" is ultimately the best way to reduce costs, and the deficit. Who's right? (Watch Rep. Steve King debate heath care reform)
This exposes Republican hypocrisy: If the GOP succeeds in repealing the Affordable Care Act, says Joan McCarter in Daily Kos, we'll pay "more for less." With the law, 94 percent of the population will have health coverage; without it, that figure drops to 83 percent, and we get stuck with a big bill in the bargain. Instead of facing facts, Republicans are exempting the repeal bill from their own budget rules that require any increase in spending to be offset by other cuts. It all proves "they care more about making petty political points than reducing the deficit."
"CBO: Health reform repeal would add $230 billion to deficit by 2021"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Actually, repeal would save us a fortune: Repealing "Obamacare" is definitely "the fiscally responsible thing to do," says Joseph Lawler in The American Spectator. The law "increases government health care spending by (very roughly) $900 billion" — it just offsets the cost with tax hikes and cuts elsewhere. The government should be using those offsets to cut the deficit — "not to finance more entitlement spending."
"Repeal and fiscal responsibility"
These numbers aren't as firm as they sound: Republicans still have "wiggle room," says Dave Weigel on Slate because these programs always, always, always cost more than anticipated." But this certainly has given Democrats an opening to "scorch Republicans" by accusing them of trying to "blow up the deficit." As usual, the reality is "a bit more complicated" than either side seems willing to admit.
"CBO: Health care repeal would cost $230 billion, we think"
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Nuclear near-misses
The Explainer From technical glitches to fateful split-second decisions, the world has come to the brink of nuclear war more times than you might think
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Published
-
What is cloud seeding and did it cause Dubai's severe rainfall?
The Explainer The future is flooded
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
American Airlines pilots are warning of a 'significant spike' in safety issues
In the Spotlight The pilot's union listed 'problematic trends' they say are affecting the airline's fleet
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published