Why James Comey should resign
It won't fix everything, but it will demonstrate that what the FBI director did was completely beyond the pale


It is now clear that FBI Director James Comey's last-minute intervention in the presidential election has given Donald Trump a boost of several points in the polls. Comey's short announcement to Republican congressional committee heads that he was investigating new emails related to the Hillary Clinton email server investigation hit that TV news sweet spot of vague but ominous-sounding, and centrist journalists were on it like a pack of dogs on a three-legged cat.
The fact that there was no concrete anything in the announcement (for all we know, the emails might not have anything to do with Hillary Clinton at all), did not even slightly hinder several consecutive days of the most crack-brained people in journalism speculating wildly about the disastrous effects it was sure to have on Clinton's campaign. That prophecy became self-fulfilling. Poll averages show Trump gaining at least a couple points, and a recent poll now shows Trump beating Clinton by 8 points on honesty.
Meanwhile, the FBI team is reportedly skeptical that they'll be able to produce anything concrete about the emails before the election — which, let's remember, is next Tuesday.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But this much is clear: James Comey should resign immediately.
Law enforcement agencies have a tremendous potential for influencing an election, for obvious reasons. If one candidate is perceived as a criminal, that is a near-guarantee that he or she will lose. This power is often abused in more authoritarian societies. Therefore, any democracy worth its salt will place careful restraints on law enforcement and elections, so as to avoid undue influence one way or another.
That is not to say that candidates are above the law, but that any investigation must be conducted with the utmost caution. In particular, preliminary findings should not be leaked, as many people tend to assume that investigation implies guilt.
Lo and behold, there is a general guideline that the FBI is supposed to do its utmost to avoid electoral politics in the 60 days before an election. This was something Comey himself apparently understood as recently as this summer — more than 60 days before election day — when he refrained from conducting public subpoenas in investigations into both Trump and Clinton's campaign, for fear of unduly slanting things one way or the other. That caution clearly didn't stop his latest announcement.
People have been going in circles trying to figure out just why Comey did such a thing less than two weeks before the election. One obvious culprit is Republican bullying. Comey is a Republican (incidentally, add one more disaster to the pile resulting from President Obama's fetishistic love of bipartisanship), and Republican elites have been savagely attacking Comey for months because he didn't clap Clinton in irons.
Republicans have been absolutely convinced since the early '90s that both Clintons are notorious criminals. The first Clinton presidency was one long unhinged witch hunt looking for any excuse to remove Bill from office, and the second Clinton presidency will be no different for Hillary. The Benghazi committee has already gone on longer than the 9/11 Commission, because they're quite obviously looking for any possible pretext to remove Hillary Clinton from American politics forever (though their actual findings keep largely exonerating her).
Now that Clinton looks likely to become president (despite the tightening polls), Republicans are already turning the investigative fever up to 11. Should Republicans maintain control of the House, I expect the impeachment articles to be drawn up approximately 27 picoseconds after Clinton takes the oath of office.
It must be said that the Clintons — with their paranoid secrecy, their constant bending or breaking of ethics rules, and their hatred of the press — do themselves no favors when it comes to this behavior. It's not a coincidence that President Obama has largely been able to escape such persecution, because the fact of the matter is that he is a more scrupulous and personally honest politician than either Clinton.
Still, a great many fervently believed conservative theories about Clinton — that she is a murderer, or deliberately allowed Ambassador Stevens to be killed, or is a literal demon from hell — are completely, utterly bananas. It was thus astoundingly irresponsible of Comey to insert himself — and by extension, the credibility of the entire federal law enforcement apparatus — into such a heated situation, with such little time before the election for it to be cleared up.
There is only one way for him to attempt to repair the damage: Resign. Now. It won't fix everything, but it will demonstrate that what he did was completely beyond the pale.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
The best food gifts for Mother's Day
The Week Recommends Forget flowers, spoil your mum with these foodie treats
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: March 24, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 24, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published