The Royal Mail has won a High Court battle to block what would have been the first national postal strike in a decade.
The Communication Workers Union (CWU), who called the Christmas strike, condemned the injunction as an “utter outrage”.
The union said it would appeal against the decision after it was granted in London on Wednesday by the judge, Mr Justice Swift, who accepted the postal company’s argument that the ballot to call the strike - which was won with 97% of the vote - was compromised by “improper interference”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Latest Videos FromThe Week
What happened in court?
The Royal Mail had sought a temporary injunction to prevent CWU workers striking in the lead-up to Christmas on the grounds that there were “irregularities” in last month’s vote.
The judge agreed. “What the CWU did in this case was... a form of subversion of the ballot process,” he said. “There was interference which would be accurately described as improper.”
The main problem with the voting process, the judge specified, was that the CWU had actively encouraged postal workers to vote at work, whereas the rules on industrial action stipulate that ballot papers have to be sent to the privacy of union members’ homes, to minimise any coercion.
The CWU argued that there was no interference or coercion at play, only “legitimate partisan campaigning”, and its leaders reacted furiously to the injunction.
“Not one single person out of 110,000 who were balloted complained to Royal Mail that their right to vote was interfered with,” said the union’s general secretary, Dave Ward.
“The Electoral Reform Services who conducted the ballot confirmed it was run in full accordance of the law, and after over seven weeks since the ballot commenced, not one single person has complained... Yet despite all of this - with no evidence supporting their claim from any employee - Royal Mail can come to this court in what is a cowardly and vicious attack on its own workforce.”
“Royal Mail has alleged that workers were being pressed to open their ballot papers on site with their colleagues, rather than at home, and were filming or taking pictures before posting their ballots together at workplace postboxes,” The Financial Times reports.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important business stories and tips for the week’s best shares - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
However, Lord John Hendy QC, representing the CWU, disagreed. “Encouraging people to vote or to vote in a particular way is not an interference or constraint imposed on them by the union in the exercise of their right to vote,” he told the court.
The judge’s ruling precludes the opportunity for appeal before Christmas - a crucial commercial time for the Royal Mail - on the grounds that it could disrupt postal voting before the 12 December’s general election - but the CWU is adamant that will not prevent it trying.
“Of course we’ll have to appeal, of course we’ll have to reballot,” said Terry Pullinger, the union’s deputy general secretary, outside the court. “This union will not back off, we’ll do everything in our power.”
