Why is Royal Mail failing to deliver?
The 507-year-old British institution is facing carve-up and even insolvency with decline of letter writing

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Royal Mail could be hit with heavy fines after failing to hit its delivery targets last year as the communications regulator Ofcom launches an inquiry into the beleaguered postal service.
Quality of service targets require Royal Mail to deliver 93% of first-class mail within one working day of collection; deliver 98.5% of second-class mail in three working days; and complete 99.9% of delivery routes on each day that a delivery is required.
However, the company confirmed on Monday that it had missed all these targets, with just 73.7% of first-class mail being delivered within one working day. It would not be the first time it has been penalised for missing delivery targets after receiving a £1.5 million fine in 2019.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Tracing its history back to Henry VIII, “the Royal Mail was still one of the jewels of Britain” until very recently, said The Telegraph. But it has fallen on hard times as corporate mismanagement, competition and a terminal decline in letter writing has left it struggling to stay above water.
What did the papers say?
The former state-owned monopoly service has endured a tumultuous decade since it was privatised in 2013 by David Cameron’s coalition government. It has spent much of this time “attempting to revamp the business to cope with the long-term decline in the posting of letters and the rapid increase in online shopping, fuelling increased volumes and competition in the more lucrative parcels market”, said The Guardian.
With e-commerce returning to pre-Covid levels following a surge in online goods and Covid testing kit deliveries during the pandemic, Royal Mail is “saddled with a vast, expensive network from Land’s End to John O’Groats, and a government-mandated universal service obligation (USO) to deliver to every postcode of the UK six days a week for a flat fee”, said The Times.
“It also has a highly unionised workforce that does not want the value of pay and benefits to be eroded,” said the paper. And “now its handling of the nation’s letters is under the microscope”.
In what Sky News described as “a contentious hearing” with MPs on the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) select committee in February, Royal Mail chief executive Simon Thompson admitted prioritising more lucrative parcels over letters.
Last week, he announced he was stepping down following a bruising two years at the helm, just days before the company’s annual results are expected to “lay bare the damage inflicted on the 507-year-old postal service by a bleak year in which it was battered by 18 days of strikes, a slump in parcel deliveries and a cyber-attack on its international delivery operations”, said This is Money.
The biggest problem, according to The New Statesman’s Will Dunn, is that “the core service it is required to provide – universal delivery at fixed prices – is expensive to operate and declining in popularity”. The amount of addressed letters being posted is down by 23% since 2019 and is now about what it was in the mid-1930s. But while they may be in long-term decline, letters still generated 44% of the company’s revenue in its last financial year.
“It won’t be long till the letter itself becomes completely redundant,” said The Telegraph, at which point “Royal Mail will simply become a parcel delivery service like DPD, but probably less reliable”.
What next?
According to Refinitiv data, analysts predict Royal Mail will report a loss of £500 million for the year to the end of March, compared with a profit of £416 million in the previous year. A warning that it was losing more than £1 million a day and could be forced to call in administrators if the situation did not improve has led the stock price of its parent group International Distributions Services (IDS) to drop more than 30% from last year.
The challenge for a successor is “to continue Royal Mail’s never-ending modernisation programme – but, in theory at least, Thompson has done the hard yards of overseeing a deal with the union”, said The Times. The paper reported that the company plans to shed 10,000 roles from its 150,000-strong workforce as it seeks to tackle its costs and wants to renegotiate the universal service obligation to ease its financial pressure. While it would continue to deliver parcels seven days a week, one long-term option would be to drop Saturday letter deliveries.
It’s worth noting, said Dunn, “that the social value of the Royal Mail’s services is high; its communication services are still relied upon by millions of people, a significant proportion of whom are elderly or vulnerable. And in an ageing society, a regular door-to-door presence could be vital; some in the industry have suggested a further diversification into services such as meter readings.”
He said “it is all but inevitable” the letter and parcel delivery arms of Royal Mail will split. “The government will then have to decide whether a company that has been integral to British identity for five centuries is worth taking back on as a public service or being allowed to wither away, becoming another bankrupt subsidiary of UK plc.”
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
The daily gossip: Travis Kelce chats about Taylor Swift's Chiefs game visit, Hollywood writers thrilled with details of new contract as strike ends, and more
The daily gossip: September 27, 2023
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The Trump Organization is over
Cartoons
By The Week Staff Published
-
Corrupted Ukraine
Cartoons
By The Week Staff Published
-
Inflation vs. deflation: which is worse for national economies?
Today's Big Question Lower prices may be good news for households but prolonged deflation is ‘terrible for the economy’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Debanking row: is Nigel Farage case just tip of the iceberg?
Today's Big Question Data watchdog warns banks over handling of sensitive data they hold on customers
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Two-child benefit cap: a litmus test for Keir Starmer?
Today's Big Question Labour leader prioritises ‘fiscal responsibility’ but risks party revolt over pledge to keep controversial policy
By The Week Staff Published
-
What’s causing China’s deflation crisis?
Today's Big Question Stalling post-pandemic recovery and weakening demand for exports could lead to growth spiral
By The Week Staff Published
-
Why aren’t soaring interest rates bringing down inflation?
Today's Big Question PM pins blame for stubborn inflation on fixed-rate mortgages, but economists say the picture is more nuanced
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
Who will get the blame for UK mortgage misery?
Today's Big Question As mortgage rates continue to soar, fingers have been pointed far and wide
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
Has Saudi Arabia lost control of oil prices?
Today's Big Question Kingdom goes it alone to cut production, risking tension with US and reigniting cooling inflation in Europe
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sticky inflation and sluggish growth: why does UK economy continue to struggle?
Today's Big Question Food prices, Brexit and the Bank of England have been blamed for poor economic performance
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published