What can Sunak learn from Thatcher about taking on the unions?
The ‘Iron Lady’ only opposed striking workers from a position of strength with public support – unlike the current PM

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
The parallels between the 1970s and 2020s have been made so often it has almost become orthodoxy. Rampant inflation, a global energy crisis and a wave of strikes make it easy to see why.
As the UK enters a second “winter of discontent” the Tories are looking to history once again to see how they can turn the current series of crises to their advantage.
Rishi Sunak has sought to channel his inner Margaret Thatcher by vowing to get tough on striking public sector workers, threatening union bosses that if they fail to call off their Christmas strikes, he will introduce new laws that restrict their ability to take industrial action.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the newspapers say?
What many people, including a large proportion of Conservatives, forget is that Thatcher did not initially take a hard line in response to union demands.
“Thatcher was an ideologue who claimed the backlash against the ‘winter of discontent’ in 1978-79 represented a ‘sea change’ in public opinion and a mandate to ‘clip the wings’ of trade unions,” said The Guardian. “But she was also a pragmatist who in 1979 gave public sector workers a 25% pay rise – roughly double the rate of inflation and more than the 19% received by private sector workers – to avert a second successive ‘winter of discontent’.”
It was not until she had won a huge second mandate from the British people in 1983 that she felt strong enough politically to take on the unions, coming to a head during the miners’ strike of 1984-85.
“Put simply, she had a plan and a theory: that the UK could stay coal-free longer than British miners could stay solvent,” said the Financial Times. The pay settlement she agreed in 1981 “was a much better deal for the miners than for her government, in part to be able to come back and have the fight on her own terms later”, said the FT, using the intervening time to build up the UK’s coal supplies.
The Spectator argued that “when Thatcher took on the unions, she did so with overwhelming public backing and only fought battles she had carefully prepared for”.
“Equally importantly,” said the FT, “she didn’t treat each and every strike as if it were one and the same. She settled on some disputes and fought on against others.”
“Sunak’s mooted legislation has inevitably invited comparisons to [Thatcher’s] implacable approach to industrial relations,” said The Spectator, but he has failed to learn these two fundamental lessons.
A third factor is time. “The really glaring difference between then and now is that, across all sectors, the unions in the Seventies had far more leeway,” wrote Phil Tinline for UnHerd. He compared a 1977 poll in The Sun, which suggested 80% of the public thought “union leaders have ‘a lot’ of power and influence in governing the country”, with one conducted last summer by Ipsos, which found only 9% of the British public thought workers had too much power.
“That long period of industrial calm, when for decades strikes became almost unknown in this country, seems to have left the Conservative government – already riven with political divisions – unable to think and act strategically against collective action by hundreds of thousands of determined public sector workers,” said James Meadway, director of the Progressive Economy Forum, on openDemocracy.
“The Tories, instead, have made a bad situation for themselves appreciably worse through thoughtless belligerence,” he added.
What next?
Peter Hitchens in the Mail on Sunday said history teaches us that governments succeed against unions by being more “flexible” not less, and by making sure they carry the public with them in any stand-off.
Asking “what sort of government gets into a public brawl with people who are universally liked and respected?” he argued that “just as we pay the police generously in return for not striking, it’s plain that governments should do the same for nurses”. Sunak spent billions of pounds “madly pumping money into all our pockets to support the Great Shutdown and Panic. Now, when finding extra money would make sense, Prime Minister Sunak poses as Mr Prudent.”
The Guardian added: “Sunak’s tribute act prefers ideological posturing to practical solutions: proposing new anti-strike laws that the Lords won’t pass as he has no electoral mandate to enact them; and doubling down on pay restraint for key workers.” Instead, argued the paper, the PM “should emulate Thatcher’s realism and offer inflation-proof pay awards to bring industrial action to an end”.
In the 1980s strong unions protected workers for as long as they could in the face of deindustrialisation that saw factories and mines close and industries move overseas.
“Now the public sector faces a government not only unwilling to increase their pay, but unclear on where the money comes from,” said The New Statesman. “Margaret Thatcher staked her political life on being stronger than the unions and won. The winter will show whether Rishi Sunak can do the same.”
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
'The United States needs to up its game'
Instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass Published
-
'Accepting defeat is Rishi Sunak's only hope of victory'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week Staff Published
-
Royal family website attacked by Russian hackers
Speed Read Pro-Kremlin group claim responsibility just two weeks after King Charles condemns invasion of Ukraine
By The Week Staff Published
-
Withdrawing benefits: 'war on work shy' or 'matter of fairness'?
Talking Point Jeremy Hunt to boost minimum wage while cracking down on claimants who refuse to look for work
By The Week Staff Published
-
Inflation vs. deflation: which is worse for national economies?
Today's Big Question Lower prices may be good news for households but prolonged deflation is ‘terrible for the economy’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Interest rates: more ‘trauma’ for households
Talking Point Latest hike will cause ‘plenty of pain for borrowers’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Interest rates rise to 5.25% for first time in 15 years
Speed Read Inflation is slowing but at 7.9% it remains well above the Bank of England’s 2% target
By Julia O'Driscoll Published
-
Is there a 'richcession' and could it help the economy?
Talking Point The wealthy may temporarily not be getting richer
By Devika Rao Published
-
Debanking row: is Nigel Farage case just tip of the iceberg?
Today's Big Question Data watchdog warns banks over handling of sensitive data they hold on customers
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Two-child benefit cap: a litmus test for Keir Starmer?
Today's Big Question Labour leader prioritises ‘fiscal responsibility’ but risks party revolt over pledge to keep controversial policy
By The Week Staff Published
-
With inflation on the mend, what will the Fed do next?
Talking Point A better-than-expected CPI report has some wondering if the central bank should press pause on another interest rate increase
By Brigid Kennedy Published