How the Electoral College works in US elections
Kamala Harris holds a narrow lead over Donald Trump nationally, but popular sentiment doesn't necessarily translate into electoral success
When it comes to presidential elections in this country, it turns out that "more" is not necessarily "better" — not in terms of capturing votes, anyway. Counterintuitive as it may seem, candidates for the highest office in the land do not run their campaigns hoping to pick up every voter they can. Rather, the American electoral system presents a challenge of convincing the right number of people to cast their ballot for a particular candidate in the right place.
By focusing on key voting demographics in key battleground states (and sometimes even battleground districts), candidates are transparently acknowledging that American elections are fundamentally not about achieving a majority of total votes, but instead about strategizing how best to game the broad, complicated system known as the Electoral College. It's states, not people, who decide elections, with each candidate working toward crossing a set threshold of electoral college votes determined by the population of each state. Whether a candidate wins a state by a single ballot or a million, they will still only receive that state's set number of electoral votes — forcing campaigns to allocate their time, money and resources accordingly to maximize their electoral, rather than overall, prospects. Understandably, it's a system that has its share of both champions and detractors who hope to abolish the structure outright. In fact, doing away with the Electoral College altogether was a "once-bipartisan consensus," Politico said.
So what is the Electoral College, how does it work and why do we have it?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What is the electoral college?
The electoral college is the name given to 538 "electors" who convene every election year to cast one vote each and choose a president. These electors have the final say on who ends up in the White House.
Rather than directly voting for a president, eligible U.S. citizens vote for the elector who is supporting the candidate that the voter wants to win. While guided by the popular vote, presidential elections are finalized and validated by the electoral college vote.
All told, a total of 538 electors are spread out across the 50 states of the U.S. in proportion to each state's population. This is "supposed to guarantee that populous states can't dominate an election," but the calculations used to distribute electors have been the subject of controversy for decades, said The Washington Post.
Each state has two electors (one for each of its senators), with any more beyond that corresponding to their number of congressional representatives. California, as the most populous state, has 55 electors, while Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington D.C. and Wyoming all have three, the lowest possible amount.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Nevertheless, small states are still over-represented. California, home to approximately 12% of the total U.S. population, has around 10.22% of the electoral college, while Wyoming, which accounts for 0.18% of the U.S. population, is given 0.56% due to the minimum electors rule.
Accordingly, California is allotted one electoral vote per around 700,000 people, while the country's least populous state, Wyoming, has one electoral vote per 195,000 people. While most states operate on a winner-takes-all system of allocating electoral votes based on the popular vote, Maine and Nebraska allow for electoral votes to be split between candidates.
Crucially, while most electors cast their vote along the line of whichever party "won" the state, they are not legally obliged to do so: occasionally, an elector will abstain from the vote or even vote for the opposing candidate.
These so-called "faithless electors" did just that seven times in the 2016 election. In 2020, seven states saw Republican-created slates of faithless electors attempt to submit votes on behalf of Donald Trump, despite his having lost the state's popular vote. These efforts formed the basis of a significant portion of post-election lawsuits against Trump and his allies.
Once state elector slates submit their votes in weeks following election day, it's up to U.S. Congress to ratify the ballots and make the election results official. It was this process that Trump and his supporters attempted to disrupt on January 6, 2021, during the capitol insurrection.
How did the system come about?
When the US Constitution was being drawn up in 1787, a national popular vote to elect a president was "practically impossible," because of the size of the country and the difficulty of communication across it, said the BBC.
Since few citizens wanted the president to be chosen by lawmakers in the capital, an alternative was proposed: the electoral college, favored in large part by southern states, where "slaves made up a large portion of the population," the BBC said. "Even though slaves didn't vote, they were counted in the U.S. census (as three-fifths of a person)."
After George Washington was elected as the nation's first president, the Founding Fathers "figured that consequent elections would feature tons of candidates who would divide up the electoral pie into tiny chunks, giving Congress a chance to pick the winner," said History.com. "But as soon as national political parties formed, the number of presidential candidates shrank."
Winning the White House
Given the peculiarities of the electoral college system, presidential candidates often target specific states in order to to rack up 270 electoral votes — half of the total plus one — to win the White House.
For example, Democrats and Republicans alike typically devote significant time and money to campaigning in Ohio, a delicately balanced swing state with 18 electoral college votes. Other typical swing states include Michigan, North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
At the same time, other states with much greater electoral college influence — such as California and, more recently, Florida and Texas (38 electors) — are given little attention by comparison, as they are considered "safe" states for the Democrats and Republicans, respectively. However, shifting demographics and political headwinds can change what is considered a toss-up into a solidly blue or red state, and vice versa. For instance, although Arizona had "previously supported the Republican presidential candidate for five consecutive elections," President Joe Biden flipped the state blue in 2020, The Arizona Republic said. Now the state is widely regarded as a purple chance for either party to secure. Florida, on the other hand, has "historically been held up as a massively important state for any White House aspirant," but is now a "comparative afterthought" as Republicans solidify their control over the local government, NBC News said.
-
Argentinian beef is at the center of American farmers’ woesThe Explainer ‘It feels like a slap in the face to rural America,’ said one farmer
-
‘Businesses that lose money and are uncompetitive won’t survive’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Film reviews: Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere, If I Had Legs I’d Kick You, Frankenstein, and Blue MoonFeature A rock star on the rise turns inward, a stressed mother begins to unravel, and more
-
Is the ceasefire in Gaza really working?Today's Big Question Neither Israel and Hamas has an interest in a full return to hostilities but ‘brutally simple arithmetic’ in region may scupper peace plan long-term
-
No Kings rally: What did it achieve?Feature The latest ‘No Kings’ march has become the largest protest in U.S. history
-
Push for Ukraine ceasefire collapsesFeature Talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were called off after the Russian president refused to compromise on his demands
-
Trump eyes regime change in VenezuelaFeature Officials believe Trump’s ‘war on narco-terrorism’ is actually a push to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro
-
‘Social media is the new tabloid’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How are ICE’s recruitment woes complicating Trump’s immigration agenda?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Lowered training standards and ‘athletically allergic’ hopefuls are hindering the White House plan to turn the Department of Homeland Security into a federal police force
-
Trump vows new tariffs on Canada over Reagan adspeed read The ad that offended the president has Ronald Reagan explaining why import taxes hurt the economy
-
Donald Trump’s week in Asia: can he shift power away from China?Today's Big Question US president’s whirlwind week of diplomacy aims to bolster economic ties and de-escalate trade war with China