Trafalgar Square sculpture: what is the meaning of Gift Horse?

Memento mori, anti-capitalist statement or just bad art – five interpretations of the fourth plinth's horse skeleton

150306_memento_mori.jpg

A new sculpture called the Gift Horse has been unveiled on Trafalgar Square's Fourth Plinth. The bronze, by German artist Hans Haacke, is a sculpture of a horse skeleton adorned with a ribbon that displays a live feed from the London Stock Exchange.

The work is the tenth piece of public art to appear on the plinth and replaces a giant blue cockerel, which stood in the spot for 18 months. But while convention cautions against looking a gift horse in the mouth, it hasn't stopped commentators arguing and speculating about what the sculpture means. Here are five interpretations:

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Anti-austerity or pro-infrastructure? London Mayor Boris Johnson, who presided over the unveiling, called the work "a startlingly original comment on the relationship between art and commerce". He went on to say that there will be those who say the "undeniably unfed, emaciated quadruped is a warning, a memento mori, a symbol of the pursuit of austerity and the George Osborne diet approach to life". But in a tongue-in-cheek speech he said that the tubular structures of the sculpture "symbolised the vital infrastructure – the Tube – that must run beneath the surface of any great and beautiful city" and celebrated the sustained investment in that infrastructure.

Politicians Appropriating Culture The Guardian art critic Adrian Searle rejected Johnson's interpretation as "vulgar and somewhat dismissive", saying the work resists interpretation. Nevertheless, he put forth his own view that the work is "against forgetting", and highlights "the dangers of politicians appropriating culture". Searle notes that the horse "looks out on the square with empty eye sockets and a skeletal grin, while the money goes round and round and the people talk".

Power and money The director of the Tate gallery, Nicholas Serota had yet another interpretation. He told Channel 4: "I think it's clearly about the fragility of power systems and the state, and the financial systems." Ekow Eshun, the culture commentator and former director of the ICA who chaired the selection committee, agreed. He told the Evening Standard that the work was a "comment on the connections between power, money and history which go to the heart of what London is as a city".

Cringe-worthy anti-capitalism In The Spectator, Digby Warde-Aldam says the sculpture is "hardly Henry Moore, but it's OK as public art goes", until you notice the strip of stockmarket ticker-tape tied in a bow around its leg. This one flourish, says Warde-Aldam, tells us the work is meant to be "a serious comment on the state of things" and that "capitalism is bad". It turns the Gift Horse from the decent side of mediocre to the plain embarrassing, he says, whacking you over the head with symbolism. It's cringe-worthy, he says, "but at least it's not David Shrigley".

Shrigley's work, Really Good, a sculpture of a hand with an enlarged thumb, is due to appear on the plinth next year.