The maths equation threatening to disprove conspiracy theories
Moon landing hoax would have been exposed in three years, according to scientist's formula
Major conspiracy theories would have been exposed within years if they were really true, a scientist has concluded.
Dr David Grimes, a physicist at Oxford University, has developed a mathematical equation he says reveals how long a conspiracy can survive without being found out.
He applied his formula to four famous "cover-ups" to show the truth behind the rumours.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"I hope that by showing how eye-wateringly unlikely some alleged conspiracies are, some people will reconsider their anti-science beliefs," he said. "While believing the Moon landings were faked may not be harmful, believing misinformation about vaccines can be fatal."
How does the formula work?
His equation expresses the probability of a conspiracy being revealed, either deliberately or unintentionally. By analysing data from genuine collusions, including the National Security Agency's Prism surveillance programme revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013, Dr Grimes was able to factor in variables such as the number of conspirators and length of time it took for the secret to be revealed.
"It represents a 'best case scenario' for conspirators," says the BBC's Alex Berezow. "It assumes that they are good at keeping secrets and that there are no external investigations at play."
What does the equation suggest about the Moon landings?
The belief that the Moon landings were a hoax has become one of the most persistent conspiracy theories of all time. Sceptics claim that the 1969 landings – and all those which followed – were faked by Nasa and that no human being has ever set foot on the surface.
Using his equation, Grimes was able to calculate that a hoax would have been revealed after three years and eight months, as it would have begun in 1965 and involved about 411,000 Nasa employees.
What about other famous conspiracy theories?
Grimes applied the same formula to three other well-known conspiracy theories. According to his calculations, the climate change "myth" would be revealed in three years and nine months, the vaccine-autism "conspiracy" in three years and two months and the "plot" to withhold a cancer cure in three years and three months.
"In simple terms, any one of the four conspiracies would have been exposed long before now," he concluded.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Many of us have warned for years of a rising ecofascist threat in response to climate chaos'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold, The Week US Published
-
Is this the end of cigarettes?
Today's Big Question An FDA rule targets nicotine addiction
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
A beginner's guide to exploring the Amazon
The Week Recommends Trek carefully — and respectfully — in the world's largest rainforest
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
The New Jersey 'UFO' drone scare
In the Spotlight Reports of mysterious low-flying aircraft provoked outlandish theories, but old-fashioned hysteria appears to have been to blame
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published