A simple scan could help doctors catch and diagnose prostate cancer without the need for biopsies, according to a new study.
Scans were also shown to be better at ruling out cancer, as well as identifying benign tumours, a finding that could greatly reduce the number of men having invasive surgery.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Dr Philip Haslam, the chairman of the British Society of Urogenital Radiology, said the findings "represent a huge leap forward in prostate cancer diagnosis".
According to the BBC, the NHS is reviewing whether the scans can be introduced widely, although the cost could be a drawback. Experts also say the limited number of scanners could present a significant obstacle in rolling out the tests across the country
Around 100,000 men in Britain are sent for a biopsy each year after blood tests suggesting they may have prostate cancer, says the Daily Telegraph.
The trial by Prostate MRI Imaging Study, led by researchers at University College London, showed that more than a quarter of them could be spared the procedure.
Patients who undergo a biopsy often do not have an aggressive tumour, or any form of cancer, and run the risk of developing urinary problems or even sepsis as a result of the unnecessary surgery.
Angela Culhane, chief executive of Prostate Cancer UK, said the current system of diagnosis was "notoriously imperfect" and described the new findings as "the biggest leap forward in prostate cancer diagnosis in decades".
-
Anti-trans scandal roils major LGBTQ+ literary prize as authors withdraw en massein the spotlight Multiple nominees for the UK's premier queer writing award have removed themselves from contention to protest the inclusion of a self-proclaimed 'trans-exclusionary radical feminist' in their ranks
-
4 ways to cover unexpected home repairsThe Explainer Home is where the heart is — but it might cost you
-
Why is Trump attacking Intel's CEO?Today's Big Question Concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's Chinese connections
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
