Bride forced to pay £64,000 in damages after online vendetta
Emily Liao destroyed a photographer’s business with a campaign of false accusations
A Canadian bride who defamed a company that had provided wedding photographs for her and her fiance has been ordered by a judge to pay more than 100,000 Canadian dollars in damages after “destroying” the photographer’s business.
In April 2015, Emily Liao and Edward Chow from British Columbia hired Kitty Chan’s company, Amara Wedding, to provide photography, makeup, hairstyling, scheduling, flowers, tuxedo rental and a master of ceremonies, reports the Vancouver Sun.
Her price was just over $6,000 (£3,400), but days before the wedding Liao disapproved of the pre-wedding photos and stopped payment. Amara carried out the work but withheld the photos and videos pending full payment.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Liao filed a small-claims lawsuit, says CTV News, which was settled “entirely in favour of the photographer”, and launched an online campaign against Chan and her business, which closed in January 2017.
According to Justice Gordon Weatherill, who issued his judgement last week, Liao used Chinese- and English-language social media sites to accuse the photographer of everything from “lying to consumers” to extortion and fraud.
Liao “claimed the defence of fair comment - that her statements were a matter of public interest and based on fact”, says The Star, but the judge found that Liao failed to prove the statements were true.
“Indeed, the evidence is overwhelming that none of them were true,” he said. “There is no doubt that [Liao] was dissatisfied with what she perceived as poor-quality wedding photographs. However, she has failed to prove that her displeasure was justified.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Weatherill said Liao was “motivated by malice” and awarded C$115,000 (£64,750) in damages to Chan, including C$25,000 (£14,000) in punitive damages. Liao’s aggressive online campaign and the sudden collapse of Chan’s previously healthy business were “no coincidence”, the judge added.
"Not only did potential customers chose to stay away from us,” Chan’s husband Kevin Leung told CTV, “photographers and other wedding professionals did not want to work with us and were gossiping about my wife’s business practice and integrity”.
-
Political cartoons for January 24Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include 3D chess, political distractions, and more
-
Ryanair/SpaceX: could Musk really buy the airline?Talking Point Irish budget carrier has become embroiled in unlikely feud with the world’s wealthiest man
-
Claudette Colvin: teenage activist who paved the way for Rosa ParksIn The Spotlight Inspired by the example of 19th century abolitionists, 15-year-old Colvin refused to give up her seat on an Alabama bus
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned