Ireland has come one step closer to removing language from its constitution enshrining the importance of women’s domestic duties and “life in the home”.
The Irish parliament’s Joint Committee on Justice and Equality has issued a report calling for the offending passage to be reworded or removed entirely.
Feminists have long criticised Article 41.2 of the Irish Constitution (Bunreacht na hÉireann), which states that “the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Latest Videos FromThe Week
“The State shall, therefore, endeavour to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the home.”
Critics say the language and the ideas it perpetuates about gender roles are outdated and inappropriate for a 21st century society.
The Irish Times describes the clause as a “paternalistic throwback to 1930s Ireland” and says that “while the sentiment may have been honourable, the language used is (in modern times in any case) insulting”.
The committee said that there is “no reasonable argument or justification for retaining the current provision” and presented two potential alternatives.
One proposal would reword the clause to make it a gender neutral recognition of carers, while the other would be to postpone any referendum on the matter until a formal public consultation into other options, including removing the clause altogether.
Their report and recommendations will now be considered by the government, who have previously suggested that the issue will be put to a public vote in the near future.
If the movement to remove the offending language is successful, it will be the latest in a series of major reforms to the constitution, penned in 1937 with the heavy influence of the Catholic Church.
In May this year, Irish citizens voted to overturn the constitution’s ban on abortion was overturned by a majority of two to one, while in October, another referendum removed language outlawing blasphemy.
However, with two more constitutional referendums on divorce restrictions and the voting rights of Irish citizens abroad on the horizon for May next year, the Irish Times warns that voters’ appetite for reform may be on the wane.
The rejection of proposed amendments which would have altered the balance of power between the Irish parliament’s upper and lower houses laid out in the constitution “showed that voters guard the Constitution diligently”, says the editorial.
The public “need to be convinced by valid argument before they will approve change. And rightly so”.
