Why did Donald Trump ‘side with Russia’ on election meddling?
US president openly questions findings of his own intelligence agencies

Donald Trump has offered an “extraordinary show of trust”, after siding with Russian president Vladimir Putin’s assertion that Moscow did not interfere in the 2016 US presidential election.
At a press conference following a summit between the two leaders in Helsinki, Trump “handed Russian President Vladimir Putin an unalloyed diplomatic triumph”, by refusing to support the collective conclusion of the US intelligence agencies on the issue, the Washington Post says.
“They said they think it’s Russia. I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” Trump said. “President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump’s statements “amounted to an unprecedented refusal by a US president to believe his own intelligence agencies over the word of a foreign adversary”, CNN says.
The New York Times says Trump’s comments drew “howls of protests from Democrats and some Republicans”, and prompted John O. Brennan, who served as CIA director under Barack Obama, “to suggest that the remarks warranted Mr. Trump’s impeachment”.
“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanours’. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin,” Brennan wrote on Twitter.
Similarly, Republican House Leader Paul Ryan was publicly at odds with Trump’s statements during the Helsinki press conference.
“There is no question that Russia interfered in our election and continues attempts to undermine democracy,” Ryan said in a statement.
The New York Times also reports that “Trump’s mood grew foul as the breadth of the critical reactions became clear” during the Air Force One flight back to Washington, with aides steering clear of the front of the plane “to avoid being tapped for a venting session” with Trump.
Why did Trump take Putin’s side?
In the wake of Trump’s Helsinki appearance, New York Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader of the Senate, said: “A single, ominous question now hangs over the White House: What could possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia over those of the United States? Millions of Americans will continue to wonder.”
According to Schumer there is only one possible explanation: “the possibility that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Exploring Georgia's southern highlands
The Week Recommends Visit Javakheti, Georgia's 'lake district', and meet the last-remaining 'spirit wrestlers' in the region
-
Delivery drivers face continuing heat danger with Trump's OSHA pick
The Explainer David Keeling is the former head of UPS and also worked at Amazon
-
Is that the buzzing sound of climate change worsening sleep apnea?
Under the radar Catching diseases, not those ever-essential Zzs
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
Today's Big Question Using civil courts lowers the burden of proof
-
'Trucking is a dangerous business'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump sues LA over immigration policies
Speed Read He is suing over the city's sanctuary law, claiming it prevents local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities
-
Obama, Bush and Bono eulogize USAID on final day
Speed Read The US Agency for International Development, a humanitarian organization, has been gutted by the Trump administration
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings
Speed Read A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" were not permissible