Donald Trump has offered an “extraordinary show of trust”, after siding with Russian president Vladimir Putin’s assertion that Moscow did not interfere in the 2016 US presidential election.
At a press conference following a summit between the two leaders in Helsinki, Trump “handed Russian President Vladimir Putin an unalloyed diplomatic triumph”, by refusing to support the collective conclusion of the US intelligence agencies on the issue, the Washington Post says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump’s statements “amounted to an unprecedented refusal by a US president to believe his own intelligence agencies over the word of a foreign adversary”, CNN says.
The New York Times says Trump’s comments drew “howls of protests from Democrats and some Republicans”, and prompted John O. Brennan, who served as CIA director under Barack Obama, “to suggest that the remarks warranted Mr. Trump’s impeachment”.
“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of ‘high crimes & misdemeanours’. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin,” Brennan wrote on Twitter.
Similarly, Republican House Leader Paul Ryan was publicly at odds with Trump’s statements during the Helsinki press conference.
“There is no question that Russia interfered in our election and continues attempts to undermine democracy,” Ryan said in a statement.
The New York Times also reports that “Trump’s mood grew foul as the breadth of the critical reactions became clear” during the Air Force One flight back to Washington, with aides steering clear of the front of the plane “to avoid being tapped for a venting session” with Trump.
Why did Trump take Putin’s side?
In the wake of Trump’s Helsinki appearance, New York Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader of the Senate, said: “A single, ominous question now hangs over the White House: What could possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia over those of the United States? Millions of Americans will continue to wonder.”
According to Schumer there is only one possible explanation: “the possibility that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump.”
-
Political cartoons for January 18Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include cost of living, endless supply of greed, and more
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
The rise of the spymaster: a ‘tectonic shift’ in Ukraine’s politicsIn the Spotlight President Zelenskyy’s new chief of staff, former head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov, is widely viewed as a potential successor
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
