An Oscar Pistorius Halloween costume has been branded “highly offensive” by a charity that supports families of murder victims.
The fancy dress outfit includes a running vest with the words “Blade Gunner 2012” and shorts, sunglasses, a fake gun, and black and silver boot covers depicting racing blades.
The sprinting outfit is in green and yellow, the colours worn by Pistorius when he represented South Africa at the 2012 Olympics, months before he shot and killed his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on 14 February 2013.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Latest Videos FromThe Week
Luton-based website Jokers' Masquerade has listed the “Adult Blade Runner Gunner Stag Costume” in its Halloween section.
“Cause lots of controversy at your next party with our Adult Blade Runner Gunner Stag Costume. This eye catching, head turning costume idea is ideal for any event, whether it be Halloween or just a shindig at a friends,” it says.
“The costume includes black and silver boot covers that come up to just under the knee, giving the impression that you have metal running blades instead of legs, just like that infamous Paralympic runner!”
Rose Dixon, chief executive of Support After Murder and Manslaughter, told The Sun: “This is incredibly insensitive and highly offensive, especially to bereaved families.”
However, it is by no means the first Halloween costume to face criticism…
Anne Frank
Online retailer HalloweenCostumes.com faced a backlash last year for selling an Anne Frank costume on its site. The dressing-up outfit featured a green beret, blue dress and brown satchel, while the description said: “We can always learn from the struggles of history! Now, your child can play the role of a World War II hero.”
The costume sparked a furious response on Twitter, with many people accusing the retailer of trivialising the memory of Frank, who spent two years in hiding with her family before they were found and sent to Auschwitz. The company said the costume was never meant to cause offence but removed it from sale.
Gagged Kim Kardashian
After Kim Kardashian West was tied up and robbed by five men in Paris in 2016, Costumeish.com put the “Parisian Heist Robbery Victim Kit” on sale for $69.99 (£53). It made no mention of Kardashian, but included a “white short sexy robe”, long black wig, sunglasses, gag, rope and “$4m” ring.
After much criticism, the company announced on Twitter: “Due to the extensive out-lash we have decided to remove the ‘Parisian Heist’ costume from our website. We are sorry if it offended anyone.”
Cecil the Lion
Costumeish.com has a history of pushing the limits of taste. In 2015, US dentist Walter Palmer caused global outrage by killing Cecil the lion during a hunt in Zimbabwe. Within weeks, the costume site launched a dentist outfit covered in blood spatters, which came with a severed lion head as a prop.
Despite fury from animal lovers, the costume company’s founder, Jonathon Weeks, refused to apologise, saying: “Maybe our money has Cecil lion’s blood on it. I’m not here to offend anybody, I’m just here to keep things questionable. We’re just in the very beginning of this Halloween season. There’s more to come.”
Call Me Caitlyn
Caitlyn Jenner’s appearance on the front cover of Vanity Fair in 2015 inspired several retailers to put Call Me Caitlyn costumes on sale. One white corset and wig combo was promoted as a unisex outfit and modelled by a man with stubble.
The sellers claimed they were celebrating the star, and Jenner said she wasn’t offended. However, her supporters were not amused, arguing that trans people were being treated as a joke. One petition to have the outfits withdrawn from sale said that “to make a costume out of a marginalised identity reduces that person and community to a stereotype for privileged people to abuse”.
