A primary school in Cheshire has called off its performance of a musical about Charles Darwin after Christian parents claimed that it ridiculed the Church.
Pupils at Hartford Manor Primary School, near Northwich, which is not religiously affiliated, had been set to perform Darwin Rocks!, which focuses on the 19th-century naturalist’s groundbreaking theory of evolution and the controversy it generated.
But the show generated a furore of its own when religious parents objected to what they perceived as the negative portrayal of Samuel Wilberforce, a bishop who rejected Darwin’s theory.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
There were also concerns about a song that includes the phrase “bump and grind”, says The Independent, which broke the story.
The show, written specifically for schools by Steve Titford, has already been performed at several primary schools around the UK without issue since it was published in 2017.
In light of the complaints, Hartford Manor announced that it would cancel the production and replace it with a less controversial show - a decision that has sparked a fresh backlash.
One parent at the school told the newspaper that capitulating to religious objections felt like “a huge step backwards” and an attempt to “whitewash history”.
Alan McDonald, a scientist who has children at the school, said: “I think it is just a thinly veiled attempt to cram religious views over the top of scientific fact, which I think is shameful, personally.”
Secular organisations reacted with dismay to the story.
The school’s head teacher, Simon Kidwell, admitted that the decision to pull the plug on the production had been “hasty”.
“We thought it would be a problem to rewrite it. So we decided to change it,” he told the Independent. “However, in hindsight I think that was a hasty decision. We could have put more effort into looking at whether we could have adapted it to make sure it was inclusive of everybody.
“I have apologised to the parents and we will consider putting it on in future years if we can make sure those bits are edited so it is inclusive for everybody,” he added.
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
