Why Obama was right to give Cuba a 'full bailout'
![Cubans](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nUFkSnzEWnS9wzfpwsuHjk-415-80.jpg)
In 2004, then-State Sen. Barack Obama was asked about the half-century-old economic and political embargo of Cuba. He said, "I think it's time for us to end the embargo in Cuba — the Cuban embargo has failed to provide the sorts of rising standards of living and has squeezed the innocents in Cuba and utterly failed in the efforts to overthrow Castro, who has now been there since I was born, so it is time for us to acknowledge that this particular policy is available."
During the darkest days of his presidency, during the lost years of 2013 and 2014, you would probably be right to assume that President Obama would sneak off to an imaginary world inside his head and fantasize about the day when he'd be able to announce that the embargo was over, that the United States and Cuba were restoring diplomatic relations, and that years of secret negotiations had secured the release of an imprisoned American spy and an American aid worker. Indeed, if the "normalization" goes well, Obama might well burnish his legacy. You can question his judgment here, but if you want to know his motivation, look no further than the first paragraph of this post.
The Washington Post's editorial board slammed Obama for granting Cuba a "full bailout." It's true: Cuba needs the money it's going to get, badly, and it hasn't done much to earn it. But Obama didn't think Cuba needed to earn its way out of the locked box of an ideological dispute that had its origins in a war that, for all intents and purposes, no longer needs to be fought. (Communism is dead; the nuclear threat from Cuba is what exactly? And, hey: Castro apologized for that, sort of.)
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Cuba remains a dictatorial country that imprisons dissidents, gays, and journalists. Earlier this year, its leaders flirted with Vladimir Putin, offering to re-open the Lourdes signals intelligence post that helped the Soviet Union suck telephone and teletype traffic from Washington, D.C., during the Cold War. Its political leaders will avoid punishment for "choking their own people," as a disappointed Cuban-American friend of mine put it today.
But the U.S. will gain a neighbor it can trade with. Florida's economy will boom. Russia will effectively be banished from Latin America. Cuba is not China; there is every reason to expect that American culture will influence the development of Cuba's political system to a much greater degree than capitalism has encouraged China to experiment with political change. As James Fallows says:
For nearly four decades, starting with a policy shift by Richard Nixon, we've concluded that it makes sense to "engage" the Communist government of a country with four times as many people as we have, on the other side of the world. Simultaneously we maintain that engagement is unacceptable and would have no positive effect on a country with one-thirtieth our population and perhaps one percent our GDP, which is full of people with family and cultural ties to the United States and is less than 100 miles off our shores. This makes sense to some members of the expat community in Florida and the legislators who depend on their support, but it shouldn't to anyone else. [The Atlantic]
The counter-argument is that the embargo has worked. It "marginalized" Cuba to the point of being puny. And being puny, it is powerless. The U.S. should have extracted far more concessions in exchange for giving Cuba everything it wanted. Cuba should not be rewarded, The Washington Post says, for denying freedom to its people.
But should Cubans be denied the full benefits of friendship and trade with the United States simply because Fidel and Raul Castro are bad? Why should they pay for the mistakes of their political leaders, especially when there is something significant the United States can do, unilaterally, to mitigate their suffering and encourage reforms on its own?
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Marc Ambinder is TheWeek.com's editor-at-large. He is the author, with D.B. Grady, of The Command and Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry. Marc is also a contributing editor for The Atlantic and GQ. Formerly, he served as White House correspondent for National Journal, chief political consultant for CBS News, and politics editor at The Atlantic. Marc is a 2001 graduate of Harvard. He is married to Michael Park, a corporate strategy consultant, and lives in Los Angeles.
-
Why is China stockpiling resources?
The Explainer The superpower has been amassing huge reserves of commodities at great cost despite its economic downturn
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Paraguay's dangerous dalliance with cryptocurrency
Under The Radar Overheating Paraguayans are pushing back over power outages caused by illegal miners
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The Week contest: Tattoo prediction
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published