Social Security: Taking reform off the table
The White House announced that President Obama’s 2015 budget will not include a plan to reduce Social Security costs.
Say farewell to the dream of entitlement reform, said Jonathan Chait in NYMag.com. The White House announced last week that President Obama’s 2015 budget will not include a plan that Republicans support to reduce Social Security costs. That plan is a new way of calculating cost-of-living increases in monthly Social Security checks, known as “chained CPI,” and would save $162.5 billion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In previous “Grand Bargain” negotiations with congressional Republicans, Obama had offered to adopt chained CPI in return for Republican support for closing tax loopholes that benefit only the rich—thereby spreading the pain of deficit reduction. Republicans said no, because of their fanatical hatred of both Obama and tax increases of any kind. Since it’s now clear that Republicans “will never, ever, ever strike a fiscal deal with him,” Obama is pulling changes to Social Security off the table, as liberals exult and conservatives erupt in hypocritical “anguished wails.”
Politics aside, the president’s abandonment of chained CPI is “a huge disappointment,” said The Washington Post in an editorial. The proposal would be a major step toward budgetary sanity and “imposes only modest sacrifice on the vast majority of Americans.” Obama is being both “cynical and irresponsible,” said Kevin D. Williamson in NationalReview.com. Just consider how relatively painless this reform would be. For every $1,000 in benefits, Social Security recipients would get $3 less in future increases under chained CPI. That’s “a trivial amount of money for the individual,” but collectively, it would produce a major reduction in our deficit spending.
Who says it’s trivial? said Terry O’Neill in HuffingtonPost.com. When compounded year after year, chained CPI would make a big dent in cost-of-living increases. Women who spent much of their working years at home, caring for children, would be particularly hard-hit, since they often reach retirement years with smaller savings and no pensions. In effect, this “reform” could mean that a future 80-year-old retiree would lose roughly a week’s groceries every month. To head off “unsustainable” deficits in the future, though, everyone must make sacrifices, said Jon Healey in the Los Angeles Times. Sadly, “Washington simply isn’t capable of making the sort of compromises necessary.” Dreams of a Grand Bargain are dead, at least for this presidency.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
A history of student protest at Columbia University
The Explainer Anti-Israel demonstrations at NYC's Ivy League university echo protests against Vietnam War and South African apartheid
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Trump is ruled in contempt'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Hainault sword attack: police hunt for motive
Speed Read Mental health is key line of inquiry, as detectives prepare to interview suspect
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published