Can Obama unite Democrats around ObamaCare?
The party is threatening to fracture over the troubled health-care law
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92b10/92b1036b7ccbd70a10e0359160b1fa61ccf5abb3" alt="Obama"
With his approval ratings dropping over the troubled rollout of the Affordable Care Act, President Obama's allies in Congress are threatening to abandon him in a blind, every-man-for-himself bid to survive the 2014 elections — an outcome that would surely weaken Obama's signature domestic achievement and the Democratic Party, perhaps for a long time to come.
In addition to getting ObamaCare on its feet, the administration now faces another monumental task: Keeping the Democratic Party together. And it won't be easy, after this week exposed gaping fissures that have long been overshadowed by the spectacle of the Republican Party.
Seeking to put out the latest fire, Obama announced Thursday that insurers could continue to offer plans that would otherwise be scrapped under the health-care law. That was enough to placate some senators who had called for the president to take action to keep Americans from losing their coverage.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e60/26e60cb924a49f61d1c912d9db390eb10f6d3fa2" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg"
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But liberals groaned that the ObamaCare fix would end up undermining the law, part of a pattern of the White House caving in out of political convenience. Here's Reid J. Epstein at Politico:
It’s all part of the growing liberal angst about Obama’s health-care rollout. The failure of HealthCare.gov to launch was one thing, but Obama’s move Thursday to allow people to keep substandard insurance policies is, for many of them, a bridge too far. They want Obama to make sure the law isn’t killed piece by piece and don’t like the idea of giving the health-insurance industry more power than it already has. [Politico]
Meanwhile, vulnerable Democrats in the Senate said Obama had not gone far enough. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who is proposing a legislative alternative that would require insurers to extend existing coverage, said in a statement she was "encouraged" by the announcement, but that she would nevertheless "be working today and throughout the weeks ahead to support legislation to fix this problem."
Sens. Kay Hagan, (D-N.C.), Mark Begich (D-Alaska), and Jeanne Sheehan (D-N.H.) — who likewise all face re-election next year in red or purple states — also backed a legislative fix.
And even among those breakaway Democrats, there's no consensus on how to counter Obama's proposal.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Hagan has said she supports the Landrieu bill because it would be a permanent rather than a one-year delay on phasing out bad insurance plans. Begich and Sheehan, though, favor a proposal drafted by Colorado Democrat Sen. Mark Udall that would let people keep their insurance plans for two more years.
"I think we have to move forward on the legislative plan," Begich told CNN, because the Obama option was "not enough."
With the midterm elections on the horizon, vulnerable Democrats understandably want to put some distance between themselves and the White House. Voters have lost faith in the president because of his broken promise, and embracing the administration's fixes while offering no alternatives could play poorly next year if ObamaCare remains a wedge issue.
In addition, lawmakers don't want the president to get all the credit for keeping people from losing their coverage with his unilateral fix. In pushing for a legislative remedy, swing-state Democrats would be able to tell their constituents that they, too, had a hand in the solution.
Still, Congress may not get a final say in the matter.
The House is schedule to vote Friday on a proposed fix drafted by Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), though that bill would be dead on arrival in the Senate. And a Senate alternative, even if it were to come up for a vote and pass, would likely get nixed immediately in the House.
In that respect, the administration's offering is "probably the only fix we're getting," wrote The Washington Post's Greg Sargent, "and the rest of the machinations among Dems are probably going to amount to little more than noise and posturing."
Democrats could also quietly come around on the administration's fix, especially if it ends up working. Landrieu, for instance, told Politico the law would "probably" need a legislative fix, but cautioned that it was too soon to "underestimate the power of a presidential directive."
For now, though, party unity remains elusive, leaving the administration even more vulnerable to Republican attacks. And with Republicans united behind one simple message (Obama lied, the law is broken), the party is playing right into the unflattering, politically damaging "Democrats in disarray" stereotype.
Obama's options at this point are pretty much down to one: Get ObamaCare working, and fast.
Jon Terbush is an associate editor at TheWeek.com covering politics, sports, and other things he finds interesting. He has previously written for Talking Points Memo, Raw Story, and Business Insider.
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published