The skyrocketing cost of winning a seat in Congress
American politics is awash in cash


Successful House candidates spent twice as much in the 2012 elections than they did in 1986, according to updated figures released Tuesday by the Brookings Institution and the American Enterprise Institute. The increase is particularly striking, says Sarah Wheaton at The New York Times, when you take into account the fact that "most House races are not as competitive as they once were."
How expensive is it to win a seat in Congress? Here is a look at campaign costs, by the numbers:
$753,000
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Amount spent (in 2012 dollars), on average, in 1986 House elections
$1.6 million
Average amount winners spent in 2012
$1.3 million
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Average spent by 256 incumbents among 2012 winners who won re-election in safe districts (where they won with 60 percent of the vote or more)
$156,000
Amount spent by their long-shot challengers, on average
$2.3 million
Average spending by 100 swing-state incumbents in 2012 who held onto their seats with less than 60 percent of the vote
$93,000
Amount spent by their challengers' campaigns, on average
$3.1 million
Average spending by the 32 House incumbents who lost their re-election bids in 2012
$2.5 million
Average spending by those ousted incumbents' victorious challengers
103
House members from "swing" districts in 1992 (defined as districts where the presidential race was within five percentage points of the national result)
35
House members from "swing" districts in 2012 (the most prominent reason for the change is post-Census redistricting, which governing parties have used to draw lines favoring their side)
$6.4 million
Amount spent by the average winning Senate candidate in 1986 (measured in 2012 dollars)
$10.4 million
Amount spent by Senate winners in 2012
$174 million
Additional spending by Democrat-aligned super PACs in the 2012 general election season. These organizations are providing a growing infusion of outside money into key races, especially in swing states
$295 million
Spending by Republican-aligned super PACs in the 2012 general election season
$6.3 million
Spending by all other super PACs in the same period
$111 million
Additional spending by Democratic party committees in 2012
$137 million
Spending by Republican party committees
$546.5 million
Total spending by 266 super PACs in 2012
80
Percentage of that money spent to oppose candidates
$290.9 million
Amount spent to oppose President Obama in 2012
$94 million
Amount spent to oppose Mitt Romney, Obama's Republican challenger
Sources: Brookings Institution, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Outside the Beltway, Sunlight Foundation
Harold Maass is a contributing editor at The Week. He has been writing for The Week since the 2001 debut of the U.S. print edition and served as editor of TheWeek.com when it launched in 2008. Harold started his career as a newspaper reporter in South Florida and Haiti. He has previously worked for a variety of news outlets, including The Miami Herald, ABC News and Fox News, and for several years wrote a daily roundup of financial news for The Week and Yahoo Finance.
-
Bombs or talks: What’s next in the US-Iran showdown?
Talking Points US gives Tehran a two month deadline to deal
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Inside the contested birth years of generations
The Explainer Battles over where Gen Z ends and Gens Alpha and Beta begin remain unsettled
By David Faris Published
-
Art review: Jack Whitten: The Messenger
Feature Museum of Modern Art, New York City, through Aug. 2
By The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published