Zero Dark Thirty's access to secret-keepers revealed
No classified techniques were "compromised," but top secret information was "provided"
An draft internal Pentagon report suggests that Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Michael Vickers revealed to filmmakers the name of a special operations planner who participated in the raid that led to the killing of Osama bin Laden even though the head of the Special Operations Command, Adm. Eric Olson, had specifically asked that the man's name and the fact of his participation in the raid not be revealed.
The report, about information provided by the government to Zero Dark Thirty's writer and director, concludes that no "classified" or sensitive special operations tactics, techniques and procedures were given to the "Hollywood executives" by Vickers or by anyone else. Still, at several points, senior Special Operations Command flag officers expressed concern about the filmmakers' access. And writer Mark Boal was present at a CIA ceremony, presided over by then-CIA director Leon Panetta, where TOP SECRET information was discussed, the report says.
I won't reveal the name or identity of the special operations planner; the report suggests his identity is protected by the Defense Cover Program. He now commands another unit within Joint Special Operations Command.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The report was requested by Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) in response to allegations that Boal and director Katherine Bigelow were given unusual and perhaps illegal access to classified information during their research for the film. The Project on Government Oversight obtained a draft version of the report and posted it tonight. POGO suggests that the Defense Department has been sitting on the report for awhile because it reflects poorly on Panetta.
Because the administration is under pressure for how it investigates unauthorized disclosures of classified information, the draft report will provide grist for the mill. It shows a concerted effort by public affairs officers to help a friendly Hollywood interlocutor tell a story that had a Hollywood ending. The film, when released, was criticized for the role it gave the CIA's "Rendition, Detention and Interrogation" program in furnishing information that led to bin Laden's whereabouts being known. POGO accurately, if archly, notes that Panetta "Disclosed Top Secret Information To Hollywood." Whether that information was used in the film, or what steps the CIA took after the fact to counsel Boal about what he had heard, are not covered by the report.
At one point, Panetta's clout was used to cut through red tape and overrule the objections of the Pentagon.
The Pentagon, through Wilson, had requested that Boal be allowed to attend the CIA ceremony, and when the CIA public affairs staff resisted, enlisting the help of a SOCOM public affairs officer, the "Chief of Staff" (a reference to Jeremy Bash, Panetta's CIA chief of staff) overruled him. (Bash denies this.) The SOCOM public affairs officer is not named.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Boal enlisted the help of Glover Park Group, a DC-based lobby and PR firm, for access. A GPG principal's name was copied on several emails Boal sent to the Pentagon. (The report does not reveal the identity of this person.)
The report says that Panetta, who became defense secretary two months after the raid and right in the middle of the period of time in question, pushed for the Special Operations Command to cooperate with Boal and Bigelow when he moved to the Pentagon.
During the CIA awards ceremony, information classified as "SECRET//NOFORN," including the specific name of the unit and the identity of its commander, was revealed in the text of Panetta's speech. (In fairness, the identity of the unit, The Naval Special Warfare Development Group, was widely known within an hour of the raid's being disclosed.)
Also, Panetta disclosed information that, upon the investigators' attempt to reconstruct it, was deemed to be "TOP SECRET//SI," or information about signals intelligence that was derived from an exceptionally sensitive source.
Adm. William McRaven, then the commanding general of JSOC and soon to be SOCOM's commander, attended the ceremony and was introduced to Boal, and was "surprised and shocked" that he'd been able to attend, according to the report.
Doug Wilson, the assistant secretary of defense for public affairs, coordinated the filmmakers' access and kept the White House informed, and although the report does not document the responses of the president's staff, it does document a meeting between Wilson and an unnamed White House deputy press secretary in which the White House aide said that members of the president's staff would reach out to Boal and Bigelow.
Boal comes off in the report as a dogged and tenacious reporter.
My name comes up in the report, too. I'll save that for the next post.
Marc Ambinder is TheWeek.com's editor-at-large. He is the author, with D.B. Grady, of The Command and Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry. Marc is also a contributing editor for The Atlantic and GQ. Formerly, he served as White House correspondent for National Journal, chief political consultant for CBS News, and politics editor at The Atlantic. Marc is a 2001 graduate of Harvard. He is married to Michael Park, a corporate strategy consultant, and lives in Los Angeles.
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
Walter Isaacson's 'Elon Musk' can 'scarcely contain its subject'
The latest biography on the elusive tech mogul is causing a stir among critics
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Welcome to the new TheWeek.com!
The Explainer Please allow us to reintroduce ourselves
By Jeva Lange Published
-
The Oscars finale was a heartless disaster
The Explainer A calculated attempt at emotional manipulation goes very wrong
By Jeva Lange Last updated
-
Most awkward awards show ever?
The Explainer The best, worst, and most shocking moments from a chaotic Golden Globes
By Brendan Morrow Published
-
The possible silver lining to the Warner Bros. deal
The Explainer Could what's terrible for theaters be good for creators?
By Jeva Lange Last updated
-
Jeffrey Wright is the new 'narrator voice'
The Explainer Move over, Sam Elliott and Morgan Freeman
By Jeva Lange Published
-
This week's literary events are the biggest award shows of 2020
feature So long, Oscar. Hello, Booker.
By Jeva Lange Published
-
What She Dies Tomorrow can teach us about our unshakable obsession with mortality
The Explainer This film isn't about the pandemic. But it can help viewers confront their fears about death.
By Jeva Lange Published