An impasse over the fiscal cliff
President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner traded dueling budget proposals, but came no closer to a compromise.
What happened
With less than three weeks left for lawmakers to avert a fiscal crisis, President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner traded dueling budget proposals this week, but came no closer to a compromise that would avert major tax hikes and spending cuts due to take effect Jan. 1. In direct negotiations with Boehner, Obama and aides slightly lowered their demand for new tax revenue to $1.4 trillion, and reportedly offered to consider an overhaul of the corporate tax code next year. Republicans made a counter-offer virtually identical to the one they made last week of $800 billion in new revenue, with no increase in the tax rate for the top 2 percent of wage earners. Boehner insisted that no progress was possible until the White House offered substantial cuts in Medicare and Social Security. “Where are the president’s spending cuts?” said Boehner.
Obama said he remained “optimistic” that a comprehensive deal could still be negotiated before year’s end, but said Republicans must first agree to a tax-rate increase on the wealthy. Boehner warned Congress not to make any Christmas plans, and Republicans expressed pessimism that a deal was close. “It’s getting worse, not better,” said House GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
Obama is arrogantly demanding total Republican surrender, said The Wall Street Journal. Some GOP lawmakers spooked by the president’s blackmail appear willing to “surrender on taxes first” in order to strike a deal on modest entitlement cuts. But Obama’s demand for both higher tax rates and limits on deductions is the “worst possible deal for the economy.” Just because Mitt Romney lost the election doesn’t mean Republicans need to “repudiate their core economic principles.” They should stand up to this bully.
Republicans are right that Medicare’s “ballooning expenses” have to be addressed, said the Los Angeles Times. But Medicare’s problems “defy easy solutions,” and it would be wrong to force across-the-board cuts into a last-minute budget deal. Most of the program’s costs are caused by the soaring cost of health care, and by the health-care system’s gross inefficiency. Almost 40 percent of all Medicare spending, for example, is consumed by just 5 percent of recipients—mostly in the final weeks of life. We need true reform, not just spending cuts.
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Democrats should accept one Republican demand on Medicare—to raise the eligibility age from 65 to 67, said Jonathan Chait in NYMag.com. Would it save a ton of money? No. But it would give the GOP base the appearance that they’d won a round of “serious belt-tightening” in Washington. Since Democrats could extract higher tax rates and other key concessions in exchange for the reform, it seems like a “sensible bone to throw the Right.” Actually, that would be “a truly horrible policy,” said Duncan Black in USA Today. Many seniors would retire without insurance, forcing them to buy private insurance or go on Medicaid. Any money the government saved from moving back the eligibility age would be “more than offset by increased costs to individuals, employers, and state governments.”
Obama is absolutely right to insist on a tax hike for the rich, said John B. Judis in TNR.com. Not only is an increase in the top tax rate supported by the public, it would help—not hurt—the economy. A Rutgers University economist recently explained why increases in the top tax rate, like the one that preceded the Clinton boom, stimulate the economy: When the wealthy take home more money, they mostly stash it away rather than spend it. But when wealth is redistributed downward, the middle class spends it—“exactly what’s right for the economy.”
Despite all the doomsday rhetoric about the cliff, said Larry Kudlow in NationalReview.com, the stock market has actually risen over the past two weeks. Investors can see the obvious, which is that “Obama has the upper hand in this post-election battle.” It’s inevitable that Republicans will have to make “a strategic retreat” and accept an increase in the top rate—perhaps negotiating it down to 37 percent instead of 39.6 percent. “Republicans don’t want to be the party of rich people,” so it’s better to yield ground today in return for some spending cuts, and resume the battle over spending, taxes, and deficits in 2013.
-
Today's political cartoons - November 2, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - anti-fascism, early voter turnout, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Geoff Capes obituary: shot-putter who became the World’s Strongest Man
In the Spotlight The 'mighty figure' was a two-time Commonwealth Champion and world-record holder
By The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published