Campaign 2012: The ‘post-truth’ era
Voters are growing more cynical than ever, as mudslinging and dishonest attacks become the norm.
If politics had a referee, said Mona Charen in NationalReview.com, he’d blow his whistle and disqualify the Democrats for running “the dirtiest, emptiest, and most deceptive campaign in memory.” Harry Reid’s made-up claims about Mitt Romney’s taxes were bad enough, but this week, the pro-Obama Super PAC Priorities USA stooped even lower, with a TV ad effectively accusing Romney of murder. The ad features a laid-off steelworker, Joe Soptic, recounting how, after Romney’s Bain Capital closed his plant, he lost his family health insurance, causing his wife to not seek cancer treatment until it was too late. “It’s a sad tale, affectingly told,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. The truth, however, is that the plant closed two years after Romney left Bain, and Mrs. Soptic died five years after the plant closed. Unable to run on his dismal record, a desperate Obama is now relying entirely on “allegations about his opponent that bear no relation to the observable universe.”
It’s hard to feel sorry for Romney, said Kevin Drum in MotherJones.com, since he’s probably the most blatant liar who’s ever run for president. Romney’s “post-truth” campaign has made an art of splicing and editing Obama’s speeches to distort his meaning, and is now resorting to “just baldly making stuff up.” Romney’s latest attack ad accuses Obama of trying to roll back welfare reform so that recipients would no longer have to work—a racially charged allegation without even the flimsiest basis in reality. Every independent fact-checker has ruled the ad a “pants-on-fire” lie. Romney has also charged that Obama was trying to keep military personnel from voting in Ohio, said Steve Benen in MSNBC.com, and made a string of other “transparently false claims.” Clearly, Romney is “convinced that there are no consequences for breathtaking dishonesty.”
In the Super PAC era, dishonest attacks may be the norm, rather than the exception, said Ellis Henican in Newsday. The Supreme Court has ruled that these new, well-funded attack groups can “smear at will and do it anonymously.” Why wouldn’t they lie with impunity? Both Obama and Romney would seem to prefer mudslinging to “really grappling with the things Americans rightly fear,” said Peggy Noonan in The Wall Street Journal. As a direct result, voters are growing more cynical than ever, and we’re “becoming a nation that believes nothing. Not in nothing, but nothing that we’re told by anyone in supposed authority.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published