Michigan's 'vagina' war
An anatomical reference during a heated political debate leads to a GOP crackdown... and a performance of The Vagina Monologues on the statehouse steps

A Michigan Democrat who was silenced on the state House floor last week after she referenced her vagina during a debate on abortion has a headline-grabbing encore planned: Rep. Lisa Brown will join activists, politicians, and others for a performance of The Vagina Monologues on the steps of the Michigan state capitol in protest. How did Michigan lawmakers wind up in such an unlikely political showdown? Here, a brief guide to what some are calling "vagina-gate":
How did this fight get started?
Brown and another Michigan Democrat were speaking out against a GOP bill that would outlaw abortion after 20 weeks, and require women who want to take a morning-after pill to do so in the presence of a doctor. Brown said to Republicans pushing the bill: "I'm flattered you're all so interested in my vagina. But no means no."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How did Republicans react?
The next day, the House GOP leadership refused to recognize another Democrat, Rep. Barb Byrum, over her retaliatory proposal that a man be required to prove his life was in danger before he could get a vasectomy (and also shut out Brown during a debate on a school-employee retirement bill). Republican Rep. Mike Callton said Brown's choice of words "was so offensive, I don't even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company."
How furious are liberals?
Very. Should we blame "run of the mill misogynist disgust of female bodies?" asks Jessica Valenti at The Nation. "Puritanical pearl-clutching? Or simply sexist legislators who would rather not be reminded that the vaginas they're attempting to control have pesky women with opinions attached to them? No matter the reason, it speaks volumes about the way in which Republicans would like women to participate in policy conversations that effect their health and lives: They wish we would just shut up already. It would be so much easier if we just left the important decisions about women's bodies up to men!"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
What's the conservative counterargument?
This isn't about the word "vagina," says Tommy Christopher at Mediaite. Brown was silenced because her "no means no" quip likens the bill's supporters to rapists waging a war on women. The GOP should defend itself against that — not "the more humorous, but less relevant, notion that they're uptight about vaginae."
And now Democrats are performing the Vagina Monologues?
Yes. Brown, Byrum, seven other legislators, and Vagina Monologues author Eve Ensler will gather in Michigan on Monday evening to read the monologues in a bid to focus more attention on the legislation, which passed the state House 70-39. (It won't be taken up by the state Senate until September.) "Bring signs, bring your vagina, bring your outrage, bring your humor," Ensler says, arguing that it's critical to assert that women "have a right to determine what happens to their bodies — whether they want children or don't want children."
Sources: Detroit Free Press (2), Guardian, Huffington Post, Mediaite, Mlive, The Nation
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published