The Girls finale: Still a 'revolutionary' TV show?

HBO's popular comedy debuted to near-universal praise in April, but faced a tough backlash throughout its first season

Girls' writer-director-creator-star Lena Dunham
(Image credit: Jojo Whilden/HBO)

When Girls premiered in April, it was lauded as a "once in a decade" masterpiece. Critics called the HBO comedy, about barely employed twenty-somethings living in New York City, "revolutionary" and "groundbreaking" for its frank depiction of sexuality and coming of age, and dubbed writer-director-creator-star Lena Dunham the "voice of a generation." Throughout its first season, the zeitgeist-capturing series sparked intense debate over race, gender, and Dunham's polarizing lead character, Hannah. The season one finale, which aired Sunday night, found Hannah questioning her relationship while her friend Jessa spontaneously marries. A full season later, does Girls live up to its pre-release praise?

Absolutely: The first season of Girls wasn't just uniformly terrific, it defied many TV conventions, says Maureen Ryan at The Huffington Post. It introduced a lead female character to whom men could relate. It disproved the notion that "women on TV can be quirky or occasionally sad," but not "deeply flawed." Girls unsettles so many people because it "blithely ignores six decades of what television has done with an entire gender."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up