Can spray tanning give you cancer, too?
Experts warn that the active ingredient used to give consumers that bronzed complexion without the UV rays could potentially cause genetic mutations
Spray tanning is supposed to provide a safe alternative to the harmful radiation used in tanning beds, or the damaging UV rays from the sun, but a panel of experts now have concerns that the spray's active chemical ingredient may cause cancer. Here's what you should know before you layer on that golden look:
Which ingredient potentially causes cancer?
Dihydroxyacetone, or DHA, is the active skin-coloring agent that is now believed to cause genetic mutations and DNA damage. The chemical is harvested from sugar beets and sugar cane, or extracted from fermented glycerin, and according to a panel of six experts ranging across fields of dermatology, toxicology, and pulmonary medicine, the chemical could harm spray-tanners if they inhale it into their bloodstream. "When DHA was first approved by the FDA in the '70s, it was being used solely in self-tanning creams," says Heather Muir at Allure, "not misted out of a spray-tan gun."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How did the panel reach this conclusion?
The experts reviewed 10 of the most-current scientific studies on DHA, determining it to be potentially hazardous. (It's worth noting that none of the studies focused on humans; they were all conducted on animals in a lab.) "I have concerns," Dr. Rey Panettieri, a toxicologist and lung expert at the University of Pennsylvania, tells ABC News. "These compounds in some cells could promote the development of cancer malignancies... and if that's the case we need to be wary of them." The FDA now recommends that customers looking to spray tan should "request measures to protect their eyes and mucous membranes and prevent inhalation."
Why is spray tanning supposedly a safer alternative to beds?
The FDA says that using UV radiation to tan "poses serious health risks," the least of which includes skin cancer, burns, and premature aging. An increasing number of reports have concluded that tanning beds are more dangerous than previously thought. Spray tanning offers a radiation-free alternative, and was thought to be so safe that "girls as young as 4 years old who compete in beauty pageants are known to be spray tanned by their moms," says Mark Greenblatt at ABC News.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
So what happens next?
In response to the report, "the tanning industry has announced it will launch a major national training initiative," says Greenblatt, which will hit thousands of salons across the U.S. in the coming weeks. Some salons, however, are insisting that spray tanning is completely safe — even without protective gear — but the FDA recommends that consumers insist on using eye and nose guards. There is, of course, another solution, says Rachel Krause at The Frisky: How about we all start embracing "our natural skin tones."
Sources: ABC News, Allure, FDA.gov, The Frisky
-
Will Starmer's Brexit reset work?
Today's Big Question PM will have to tread a fine line to keep Leavers on side as leaks suggest EU's 'tough red lines' in trade talks next year
By The Week UK Published
-
How domestic abusers are exploiting technology
The Explainer Apps intended for child safety are being used to secretly spy on partners
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Scientists finally know when humans and Neanderthals mixed DNA
Under the radar The two began interbreeding about 47,000 years ago, according to researchers
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published