Trans inmates at risk as prisons bar gender-affirming care
The new policy is reigniting concerns about forced conversion therapy
After recent years of being the focus of an aggressive legislative push to mitigate their access to health care, transgender prisoners now face a similar offensive. President Donald Trump has instated a new policy for the federal incarceration system, one that mirrors an outdated, controversial practice.
‘Culture war targeting transgender civil rights’
The policy will impose treatment targeting “psychological distress/dysphoria” through talk therapy and “psychotropic medication” like antidepressants until the gender dysphoria diagnosis is considered “resolved,” said the Transitics Substack. The new policy designates gender dysphoria as a mental illness that requires “routine mental health care.” Under the new rules, federal prisons “won’t just medically and socially detransition trans people en masse,” they will “actively try to ‘cure’ them of their gender dysphoria.” The policy has been compared to conversion therapy, a dangerous practice recognized by the United Nations as a form of torture.
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The changes align with an executive order Trump signed almost immediately after taking office, called “Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.” The order said that the federal prison system would ensure that no federal funds would be used for any “medical procedure, treatment or drug” for the purpose of “conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex.” In a lawsuit challenging the order, a federal judge ordered that the prison would continue providing hormones and accommodations. However, in court papers and interviews, transgender people have “described their access to hormone treatments and social transition supports as inconsistent,” said The Marshall Project.
The new policy is the “latest move amid a culture war targeting transgender civil rights nationwide,” with hundreds of anti-trans bills passed at the state-level over the last several years, said the Marshall Project. Last year, the Supreme Court upheld gender-affirming care bans for young people, which have been passed in 20 states. The decision “made it pretty clear” that a ban with “any conceivable rational basis” must be allowed, Jared Littman, a government attorney, said at the hearing announcing the prison bans. In addition to the federal policy, prison systems in Georgia, Kentucky, Utah and Florida have banned access to gender-affirming care.
‘Not just cruel but reckless’
Even before the latest policy, gender-affirming care was inconsistent for trans inmates. Denying hormones to “people in distress” and withdrawing them from “people who are stable undermines safe facility operations,” Alix McLearen, who authored earlier versions of the Bureau of Prisons’ transgender policy manuals, said to the Marshall Project. “From a corrections management perspective, this is not just cruel but reckless.”
Prisoners in Georgia are suing state officials over the state’s policy, which is similar to the federal one. If the new federal prison policy is implemented, and “it’s not enjoined, people will die,” Chinyere Ezie, an attorney representing the plaintiffs in the Georgia suit, said to the Marshall Project. People will die from suicide or will “die or be severely hurt from castration attempts.” Those who don’t lose their lives will “experience the very extreme physiological symptoms of hormone therapy withdrawal,” in addition to “psychological symptoms, including depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation.”
Rebecca-James Meskill, a transwoman incarcerated in Alabama, told Uncloseted Media she was taken off hormones after the original executive order. She did not receive them again until six months after the judge issued the injunction. During that time, she frequently broke out in hives, and the dysphoria about her body hair caused her to scratch her arms until they became scarred. Being off hormone therapy has “left me feeling diminished in every aspect of life,” Meskill said. Her body “started re-masculinizing,” and her body hair is “growing thicker and faster.” The lack of gender-affirming care makes her feel “hopeless and like I need to avoid people.”
