Anatomy of a campaign ad: Planned Parenthood's 'Out of Touch'
Planned Parenthood Action Fund pushes the idea that Mitt Romney is waging a war on women, and uses $1.4 million to get its message across

The group behind the ad: "Out of Touch," an attack on presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney (watch the ad below), was launched by the Planned Parenthood Action Fund (PPAF), the political arm of Planned Parenthood, after PPAF endorsed President Obama — only the third time the 90-year-old organization has endorsed a presidential candidate.
The ad: The spot kicks off with a controversial clip in which Romney says, "Planned Parenthood — I'm going to get rid of that." A voice-over declares that the GOP presidential hopeful would "deny women the birth control and cancer screenings they depend on." Next, another Romney snippet has him saying he'd overturn Roe v. Wade, a move the voice-over says would "deny women the right to make their own medical decisions." Finally, we hear audio of a male Romney aide responding to a phone call about equal pay: "We'll get back to you on that." "Romney's putting your paycheck at risk," says the voice-over, before calling Romney "out of touch and wrong for women."
The ad buy: The PPAF is spending a whopping $1.4 million to air its ad on broadcast and cable TV in Florida, Iowa, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., through June 19.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The strategy: The PPAF, which "has become increasingly politically active in the past two years, since House Republicans pushed to cut off all government funds for the group," is trying to "play into the Obama campaign's argument that Romney and Republicans are waging a 'war on women,'" says Cameron Joseph at The Hill. The Obama campaign must be thankful, says Maggie Haberman at Politico. The size of the ad buy and "the surgical nature of the strike represent something of a test assault on Romney."
The reaction: The problem with the Romney quote about "getting rid of" Planned Parenthood, says FoxNews.com, is that "in the original interview with a St. Louis TV station, Romney appeared to be saying he'd get rid of federal funding for Planned Parenthood, and not the organization itself." When pressed about the spot's accuracy on MSNBC's Morning Joe, PPAF president Cecile Richards noted, "Those are his own words — I didn't make those up." But by "equating 'women's health' with access to contraception and abortion" is Planned Parenthood "saying that pregnancy is a disease?" asks Rick Moran at The American Thinker. The organization may regret raising its own profile in the campaign and, thus, inviting more scrutiny and criticism. Whatever the result, says Katie J.M. Baker at Jezebel, "even in the bullshit heavy political sphere, there's nothing more powerful than using someone's own words against him."
Sources: The Hill, FoxNews.com, Politico, MSNBC, The American Thinker, Jezebel
For more campaign ad anatomies see:
Obama's "Steel"
Scott Brown's "Independent"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published