Ordering the bin Laden raid: Was it really a tough call?
Republicans insist that Obama shouldn't brag about launching a covert assault to get the al Qaeda leader because any president would have done the same

The raid that killed Osama bin Laden has become quite the political football this election season. Obama's campaign brought it up, suggesting in an ad that ordering the raid deep inside Pakistan was a bold and risky move that GOP challenger Mitt Romney would not have made. Romney countered by saying that any president, "even Jimmy Carter," would have done the same thing Obama did. Donald Rumsfeld, Defense secretary under George W. Bush, backed up Romney this week, saying that ordering the raid wasn't a "tough call." Was it really an easy decision to send in the SEALs?
It took guts: No leader takes the decision to send U.S. troops into covert combat lightly, say Sahil Kapur and Eric Lach at Talking Points Memo. Rumsfeld knows that — after all, he called off a mission in 2005 targeting Ayman al-Zawahiri, the man who has since replaced bin Laden as al Qaeda's leader, because it risked too many American lives and might have angered Pakistan. The fact that Rumsfeld held back shows "how difficult such a decision is to make."
"The hunt for Bin Laden: What exactly did Obama do?"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It was an easy call: "It is unseemly to talk about the president's 'courage,'" says The Washington Times in an editorial, when it was the special operations forces who really showed bravery during this raid. Obama risked nothing, as the mission "would have been just another of the many secret government operations kept under wraps" if it had failed. With no personal downside, the decision to approve the raid really was "a no-brainer" for Obama.
Even if it was easy, Obama deserves credit: Rumsfeld isn't necessarily being hypocritical, says Michael Crowley at TIME. The Bush administration had a policy of "largely outsourcing the hunt for al Qaeda in Pakistan to" Pervez Musharraf's army, so Rumsfeld couldn't risk angering Islamabad. But if it was easy for Obama to send the SEALs where Rumsfeld wouldn't, it was only because he had abandoned George W. Bush's "failed approach," and vowed to do the dirty work ourselves instead of counting on an unreliable ally.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
Sudoku medium: March 31, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published