Ordering the bin Laden raid: Was it really a tough call?

The raid that killed Osama bin Laden has become quite the political football this election season. Obama's campaign brought it up, suggesting in an ad that ordering the raid deep inside Pakistan was a bold and risky move that GOP challenger Mitt Romney would not have made. Romney countered by saying that any president, "even Jimmy Carter," would have done the same thing Obama did. Donald Rumsfeld, Defense secretary under George W. Bush, backed up Romney this week, saying that ordering the raid wasn't a "tough call." Was it really an easy decision to send in the SEALs?

It took guts: No leader takes the decision to send U.S. troops into covert combat lightly, say Sahil Kapur and Eric Lach at Talking Points Memo. Rumsfeld knows that — after all, he called off a mission in 2005 targeting Ayman al-Zawahiri, the man who has since replaced bin Laden as al Qaeda's leader, because it risked too many American lives and might have angered Pakistan. The fact that Rumsfeld held back shows "how difficult such a decision is to make."

"The hunt for Bin Laden: What exactly did Obama do?"

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

It was an easy call: "It is unseemly to talk about the president's 'courage,'" says The Washington Times in an editorial, when it was the special operations forces who really showed bravery during this raid. Obama risked nothing, as the mission "would have been just another of the many secret government operations kept under wraps" if it had failed. With no personal downside, the decision to approve the raid really was "a no-brainer" for Obama.

"Obama's no-brainer"

Even if it was easy, Obama deserves credit: Rumsfeld isn't necessarily being hypocritical, says Michael Crowley at TIME. The Bush administration had a policy of "largely outsourcing the hunt for al Qaeda in Pakistan to" Pervez Musharraf's army, so Rumsfeld couldn't risk angering Islamabad. But if it was easy for Obama to send the SEALs where Rumsfeld wouldn't, it was only because he had abandoned George W. Bush's "failed approach," and vowed to do the dirty work ourselves instead of counting on an unreliable ally.

"Was the bin Laden raid really 'not a tough decision'?"